To be fair, that way the poll is structured makes it hard not to vote for that. If someone wanted pathways 1, 3, and 6 or 2 and 4, basically any combination of pathways, they're best bet is to choose option 8. Why wouldn't someone vote for more content, even if it means one path is something they might not like, they'll get multiple options that they initially wanted. If the poll asked which pathway could be cut going forward, then maybe you may get a more accurate representation of what people want.
wrong - if you wanted 1, 3 and maybe 6 -> then you klick on 1, 3 and maybe 6, and your vote will be "1, 3 and maybe 6"
There is even a hint that you can vote more than one:
Asides that, most feedback was like "I don't want martin content, but i am ok with it for the fun of others when it's avoidable"
I am one of those - i HATE martin, but why would i ruin the fun of others just because of my personal taste?
I am just not on his path, so i don't see any martin sex.
It's just pure arrogant selfishness of idiots who act like "I PERSONALLY don't want to see, so no other has the right to see .....".
Only because they are too stupid to avoid a path by simply say/chose "NO". I guess that's the same people who still think whenever a women says "no" actually means "Yes"