- Thread starter Hitman955
- Start date
slackster
Active Member
- Feb 1, 2017
- 918
- 2,148
It's been a LONG time since I last played this, so I've started over from Chapter 1.
Quick question - Do the links include the extras by default, or do I need to search for them.
Quick question - Do the links include the extras by default, or do I need to search for them.
cxx
Message Maestro
- Nov 14, 2017
- 73,844
- 37,888
cxx
Message Maestro
- Nov 14, 2017
- 73,844
- 37,888
so far she hasn't nor has daddy dearest and will there be driving is up to guesses (devs won't tell).
To me the game seems to be a little on rails recently. Not really much conflict or choice that really seems like it matters.
It will probably lead to a threesome, so if you don't like sharing with guys just choose no.
There will be sharing/swinging paths with at least 2 or 3 dudes, but don't worry, everything is optional so far. Even if you make a "wrong" choice at any point, you can click on the upper right corner (on the love points) and change the paths from there. So far there isn't any MMF content, but in the next update there will be. There is a scene with Olivia and Graham but he's just watching and you can completely avoid it if that bothers you. Just don't go to their place when she asks you.
There's a scene in a photoshoot where Ryan (the photographer) asks for a topless photo. Don't let her do it and you'll be ok with him too. There isn't any content with him yet, but if you let him take the pic, D will tell you that she likes him, if you don't she'll tell you she doesn't see him that way.
Monetauro
Well-Known Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 1,074
- 8,169
thewhatever
Member
- Aug 5, 2017
- 119
- 73
Deceiving episode
back to pure DD sex scene and her ass is still awkward , I think it's time for a new game from Mr Dot like dating my cousin or niece
back to pure DD sex scene and her ass is still awkward , I think it's time for a new game from Mr Dot like dating my cousin or niece
There really shouldn't be tbqh. His inclusion as a sexual fantasy or actual sex option is purely token and definitely continues the problematic over-sexualization of black males in erotica but lets go past that part. Martin has absolutely no value to be considered as a fantasy object for the D or a sharing option for the F. They didn't build the character that way, his contributions don't warrant that status. If they wanted to follow the story then Martins obvious inclusion should be as a tool for Rachel to use to pursue D and F. His relationship with Maria going on while she was obstructing the MC proves that he was never that good of a friend to the MC when his sexual interests are included. My opinion is that they should have introduced him as a sexual interest to Rachael and then have him plot to use the situation to promote his fantasies of D which he alluded to with his comments, and could have ultimately concluded with him in a Lucas type situation where he is forceful and rejected and eliminated or him choosing his friendship with the MC over his own desires for D and sexual relationship with Rachael which would then validate his inclusion as a a fantasy figure or sex option. Final note, if they were going to add situations just to be inclusive then the obvious choice probably should have been a female and/or trans char of color potentially in a dominant sex scene with a strap on/penis. Just saying...
You are absolutely right but it's quite obvious that they just wanted to include some BBC because there are people who get off with that or for "diversity"... I'm not a fan of it because and it doesn't fit with D's character, (The innocent girl who had sex with only one guy in her life, will fuck a random dude she only met a couple of times, just because he complimented her once and she watched interracial porn... And it'll probably be a one night stand thing, since the dude's living almost a day away... Right... That seems plausible) but since it's optional who gives a fuck?
Last edited:
"Problematic"
hahahahahahahahaha oh man
Just no, fiction is not reality, fiction does not nay should not answer to reality, be accountable to reality or be restricted by whatever political climate you have been lead to believe exists because it would somehow change how people think to read a fictional story, that is not how the human brain works, youve been lied to.
In fact the more "problematic" content there is the better, its always the most interesting, the ones that dont give a shit about the moralism of the day.
Absolute Freedom for art. Always.
True, but I think it could have been done better. Honestly, there are a lot of sexual situations in DMD that are barely held together for the sake of options and I think if they are going to go that route then they might as well just wrap the whole plot and publish a catalog of multiple choice scene options. It wouldn't be too hard to make things a bit more plausible and further the story experience. But who am I right?
Except, your living in a reality where the industry is defined by that political climate and the realities of why those things are problematic are also well defined. My post wasn't meant to restrict artistic freedom but to point out that Martins inclusion seemed based on those same political factors rather than developed rationally within the plot. But seriously, it's plot left the rails for fetishism already so what's one more, right?