That's fine, the real jobs pays the bills and that should take priority. I really enjoy this game and thank you for taking the time to make it out of your life
Those are perfectly valid points. The added development time for animations isn't that large. And as we do more of them and get better at them, producing them becomes faster. Right now our biggest set back is the production of the regular static images. We've streamlined and economized all that we can, and it's still the longest part of the development process.
We've considered bringing on more hands to help with the art, but the concern is that any artist worth their salt is either doing their own project, or would be asking far more than we could pay for their services. Having learned Daz from scratch, we could in theory train someone to back fill some of the artwork, but then we're still talking about an investment of time, and there's no guarantees that once that person is fully capable they don't ditch our project for their own.
It's a damned if we do, damned if we don't.
Being the lead writer for the story though, I am trying to get better about adding more descriptions during the sex scenes, but I admit, it is a challenge. Let's be honest, there are a limited number of ways to describe fucking. And when 60% of your game contains pornographic material, the descriptions get worn out pretty quick. But I like challenges, so we'll push forward and see what we can come up with to keep it fresh.
I sometimes consider doing all the sex scenes in poetic prose:
"Kneeling down, I whiffed the sweet ambrosia of Jane's pussy as her armoa rose into the air like the sweet blossoming of flowers in the spring. Her lips bore the wet dew of arousal, glistening in the soft light of a thirty watt incandescent bulb. I stuck my tongue forward, eager to pierce her womanhood like a hummingbird suckling for her sweet, sweet nectar."
But my team frequently vetos these efforts.
Appreciate the feedback and the compliment. Regardless of what we end up doing with animations in the long run, we definitely want to increase the number of images cycling through the sex scenes. That's high on the agenda at the moment.
Also to anyone interested, we are live streaming in 1-hour. The link to our picarto is in my signature.
We had a poll to determine what we'd be working on and it looks like we'll be doing a Jane image in Roger's man cave.
We're going to use viewer feedback to build the image, so it'll be interesting to see how nasty things get.
Note this won't be a scene from the game, just a chance to see our process and for those who want it, a bit of a Daz tutorial.
Cheers!
We had a poll to determine what we'd be working on and it looks like we'll be doing a Jane image in Roger's man cave.
We're going to use viewer feedback to build the image, so it'll be interesting to see how nasty things get.
Note this won't be a scene from the game, just a chance to see our process and for those who want it, a bit of a Daz tutorial.
Cheers!
- Dec 17, 2017
- 7,426
- 9,686
- Jun 12, 2017
- 829
- 2,377
kudos to your team
i imagine its pretty hard to find a balance between using the same 2 words each sentence and sounding too pretentious.If you missed today's live stream you can see the results of our labor here. Cheers!
I was able to catch a little bit of your stream today. Very cool idea! Keep up the good work, man! Almost made me want to stop using ghost lights... Almost...
I have a tendency to lean that direction in most of my writing too, have to see how it goes in the games.
No of course, that all makes perfect sense and I don't disagree with any of it. We go back and forth among ourselves even on the animation debate. Right now we're bypassing them to try and get the next update out asap. The plan for now is to circle around and complete them at a later date, just in the interest of keeping a schedule.
And that is a perfectly fair request. We got a lot of balls in the air at the moment no doubt. It's just hard to find that consistent stride between game production and everything else. We'll get there, we just have settle on all the details and try to find a way to consistently work on the game every single day.
Strangely enough I've looked at a number of online sciences courses and none of them seem to address the physics of bouncing titties. A huge scientific oversight if you ask me. I believe"Non-Linear Equations for Dampened Breast Motion" should be offered in every math curriculum. But I digress.
You raise a good point. It would probably be worth it as we get serious about animation to do a real study of...I'm not sure what to call it, sexual kinetics perhaps? I was quite pleased with that animation, but now that you've pointed it out, the simple bi-directional movement of the breasts does seem overly simple. Solid feedback! Thanks.
And I absolutely agree, story is everything. In a perfect world, I'd have one or two dedicated Daz artists who focus on the visuals while I crank out story. One day perhaps, if fortune favors.
Cheers mate.
Well, with regards to boob physics, if a woman is laying on her back, and the mass was perfectly centered and balanced over the attachment point of the chest, then yes, they would have a simple back and forth sway.
However, on a woman with natural breasts with some heft to them, gravity is going to generally pull them outwards to the side. Now, assuming a back and forth bodily rocking motion of, say, standard missionary, the attachment point of the boobs in relation to where their mass has settled (i.e. the side) is perpendicular to the rocking motion.
As the attachment point doesnt really move much (or else the boobs would relocate!), only where the mass has settled will significantly change, creating a pendulum like effect, which will create a natural arc motion.
Then, as the boob reaches the limit of the arc, enough of the mass has come back towards the center, and with enough inertia, they could just sway towards the center, more or less completing a full circle, and giving them the circular wobble they are known for.
So, yeah. Boob physics.
However, on a woman with natural breasts with some heft to them, gravity is going to generally pull them outwards to the side. Now, assuming a back and forth bodily rocking motion of, say, standard missionary, the attachment point of the boobs in relation to where their mass has settled (i.e. the side) is perpendicular to the rocking motion.
As the attachment point doesnt really move much (or else the boobs would relocate!), only where the mass has settled will significantly change, creating a pendulum like effect, which will create a natural arc motion.
Then, as the boob reaches the limit of the arc, enough of the mass has come back towards the center, and with enough inertia, they could just sway towards the center, more or less completing a full circle, and giving them the circular wobble they are known for.
So, yeah. Boob physics.
- Aug 6, 2016
- 7,793
- 43,864
It's a false positive.
You can upload the exe to VirusTotal.com and see the results for yourself.
Or you can see mine. It's from 1.0.6 pc.
You must be registered to see the links
My Defender is fully updated. You may need to update Windows Defender but I don't know it works with your Windows version since I use Win 10.
That it may, but it's no where near as fun. Or satisfying.
I remember years ago I used to think the idea of business travel was exciting. I was dumb then. So very, very dumb. Long checkpoints, tight time tables, delayed flights and stupid long hours in airports. I thought it was going to be more like Madmen. I fly to a new town, meet up with whoever my girlfriend is in city A. Fuck a bunch, do a little business and then fly home like nothing happened.
Turns out TV is bullshit.
Thanks. I'm glad you enjoyed it.I was able to catch a little bit of your stream today. Very cool idea! Keep up the good work, man! Almost made me want to stop using ghost lights... Almost...
Maybe if I can convince you to keep watching, in another four or five streams I'll have you giving up ghost lights.
Though I'll be the first to admit I am just biased against ghost lights for no good reason at all. I think it's the contrarian in me. Everyone says to use them and that they're easy, so I gotta be like, "Fuck Easy!"
Though all jokes aside, learning to play around effectively with spotlights has taught me a lot about real world lighting. Kind of has me wanting to try my hand at photography one day as a hobby.
But seriously though, if ghost lights work for you, go for it! Do whatever you find the most functional and render onward!
Cheers mate.
I worry that my own descriptive prose might get the better of me without realizing it. Next though you know Roger's eating pussy while making bird-faces because I got too carried away with the hummingbird metaphor.
Being an artist is hard.
Look, I really appreciate you trying to help, but my plan was to watch a shit ton of porn and when asked why I would reply, "For Science! For Math! For Physics!"Well, with regards to boob physics, if a woman is laying on her back, and the mass was perfectly centered and balanced over the attachment point of the chest, then yes, they would have a simple back and forth sway.
However, on a woman with natural breasts with some heft to them, gravity is going to generally pull them outwards to the side. Now, assuming a back and forth bodily rocking motion of, say, standard missionary, the attachment point of the boobs in relation to where their mass has settled (i.e. the side) is perpendicular to the rocking motion.
As the attachment point doesnt really move much (or else the boobs would relocate!), only where the mass has settled will significantly change, creating a pendulum like effect, which will create a natural arc motion.
Then, as the boob reaches the limit of the arc, enough of the mass has come back towards the center, and with enough inertia, they could just sway towards the center, more or less completing a full circle, and giving them the circular wobble they are known for.
So, yeah. Boob physics.
Though if we ever hit the big time with this game, I'd absolutely hire you as our "Breast Displacement Specialist Manager" or BDSM for short.
Cheers mate!
Too bad it's not possible to like the same post multiple times