I don't know why people even bother defending this kind of thing. I'd like to remind everyone that the Japanese more or less invented this entire Genre, and there are hundreds of Japanese devs that create and release games on a relatively consistent schedule with consistent quality all the time. They don't go months upon months, or even years with no meaningful updates. I follow a couple dozen different developers on Ci-En, and some of them have created and released MULTIPLE fantastic games in the time that this game has been in development. In some cases they work entirely solo on the game as well, creating CG, sprites, writing the game, programming it, bug-fixing it and often releasing post-launch updates that add all new content. Here's some that I like:
You must be registered to see the links
(Two games released since 2017, third in dev)
You must be registered to see the links
(Three games released since 2017, fourth in dev)
You must be registered to see the links
(Last game released last summer, next game scheduled for next month)
This is embarrassing, and indefensible. People are free to give money to whomever they wish, but nobody should pretend that this isn't unethical. Every single person that pays money into the development of a game for months only to receive zero new actual content and some bug fixes would be disappointed. I'm not going to go so far as to say that developers need to be sued or something, people are responsible for what they spend their money on and are equally responsible for this kind of outcome when they support a creator with a bad or inconsistent record, but the fact that people still run defense for games like this and Accidental Woman are insane to me. The Patreon model is perfectly suited to milking people for absurd amounts of money with almost zero accountability for your lack of actual effort or content and I wish more western developers would just develop the games and release them without demanding a steady stream of $5000 per month first.