Ready to play dirty? Command your Lust Goddess now. Play Now!
x

Nottravis

Sci-fi Smutress
Donor
Game Developer
Jun 3, 2017
5,132
27,295
765
Other than Mass Effect i haven't played many scifi game who actually try to take time to make some sense from their ingame science. Most just briefly mention things, similar the way Star Wars games do.

Hell i played the Anno 2250 from ubisoft and i don't remember the game ever bothering to explain much of the tech behind the ships and the lunar colony you needed to build.
*noddities*

I mean I know really it shouldn't matter that much given the genre of H5 but...it sorta does? I think anything that is immersion breaking is an issue and since I've set out to make a game with a more grounded feel to it, anything that breaks that feel is a problem.
 

Sulring Durgul

Active Member
Sep 2, 2018
828
2,582
470
Just a little idea about just how many light sources in space without a pesky atmosphere..some great contrasts with man made lighting included.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Nice, but is it all filmed with a standard rig? Some of the sequences look like they have been shot with an IR camera.
 

Oddball2k

Woof, woof, woof!
Donor
Jun 1, 2018
408
1,579
339
Just a little idea about just how many light sources in space without a pesky atmosphere..some great contrasts with man made lighting included.

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
And to add to this post, very nice video Sinphil, it reminds me that i never saw any particles illuminations in all my ISS's EVAs re-watches... space is not empty but not so particles filled or you are in big troubles when you are above the atmosphere of an astral body.
 

tontoman

Active Member
May 4, 2017
705
557
317
*noddities*

I mean I know really it shouldn't matter that much given the genre of H5 but...it sorta does? I think anything that is immersion breaking is an issue and since I've set out to make a game with a more grounded feel to it, anything that breaks that feel is a problem.
So long as I don't see a space ship arriving at a space station, pointing towards it, engines going full throttle (so max acceleration as it arrives) and then magically stopping as it arrives.... I'm good :).

But what can/will break it depends on the person. The correct science can break it for someone expecting the wrong (see above.. and why it's almost ALWAYS done), and the wrong knowing the right. You can't win ;)

Do love The Expanse for getting much of the gravity stuff correct. Now there's an example of using science giving plot points. All the combat is physics based with the leading, hard burns, Gs etc.

Other than Mass Effect i haven't played many scifi game who actually try to take time to make some sense from their ingame science. Most just briefly mention things, similar the way Star Wars games do.

Hell i played the Anno 2250 from ubisoft and i don't remember the game ever bothering to explain much of the tech behind the ships and the lunar colony you needed to build.
That because Star Wars isn't really sci fi (the movie, let alone the game heh). It's fantasy based, with space weapons. You've got your Knights (Jedi), wizards (the more magical jedi powers), princess, pirates etc. In general the science should have something directly to do with the plot for sci fi (why so many sci fi dystopian future movies on how tech might twist things). Gattaca (DNA checking), Moon (would be a spoiler), Altered Carbon (mind swapping). Then you need to know the science as it's part of the plot, if it's just a gun to shoot someone with, not so much.
And much of it would be problematic to explain. Like what is a phaser. Is it a light weapon, because if so we shouldn't see it like it's done on screen. So better leave it, and keep the cool visuals.

Ahhh, nothing like science and movies for a Friday night post beer heh.

edit: thinking about games. SOMA and Control are two games that are pretty good with science stuff (one more than the other being based on reality) as being explained and ingrained into the gameplay. But yeah, certainly not many.
 
Last edited:

Nottravis

Sci-fi Smutress
Donor
Game Developer
Jun 3, 2017
5,132
27,295
765
So long as I don't see a space ship arriving at a space station, pointing towards it, engines going full throttle (so max acceleration as it arrives) and then magically stopping as it arrives.... I'm good :).
*so promises this won't happen!*
But what can/will break it depends on the person. The correct science can break it for someone expecting the wrong (see above.. and why it's almost ALWAYS done), and the wrong knowing the right. You can't win ;)
Yeppers! I suspect everything will probs be a compromise between fact, asset rig and time with a smidge of "does it look right", but providing I only ever end bending rules as opposed to breaking them I'll be happy :)

Do love The Expanse for getting much of the gravity stuff correct. Now there's an example of using science giving plot points. All the combat is physics based with the leading, hard burns, Gs etc.
Really must get around to watching this at some point!
 

TomberryDude

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2017
1,459
5,788
729
*so promises this won't happen!*


Yeppers! I suspect everything will probs be a compromise between fact, asset rig and time with a smidge of "does it look right", but providing I only ever end bending rules as opposed to breaking them I'll be happy :)


Really must get around to watching this at some point!
Just use Star Wars sound effects. - A Lazy Man
 
4.10 star(s) 68 Votes