- Jul 22, 2022
- 15
- 241
- Thread starter Maleficent
- Start date
- Nov 14, 2017
- 59,996
- 30,034
every couple months (~6 months) as for next update i'd say on november.
- Mar 9, 2020
- 146
- 213
It's a nice game, Nikki and Valeria are my favorites
- Jul 13, 2022
- 220
- 359
I'd eat Nutella out of Valerias asshole my bros. She's got a nice ass. Far out
- Jun 30, 2022
- 280
- 412
Please tell me we get the option to ditch Zach ASAP? Or at least that he gets written back to minimal content.
- Jun 30, 2022
- 280
- 412
- Nov 14, 2017
- 59,996
- 30,034
well he decides to go hanging with "cool guys" and not with mc.
- Jul 11, 2021
- 89
- 466
- Jun 30, 2022
- 280
- 412
Is the MC saying "minx" in VN's some sort of inside joke? The only people in real life who say it, have never touched a boob.
- Nov 12, 2021
- 2,198
- 16,046
- Jan 1, 2019
- 874
- 1,908
While it may not be used where you live, it may be used in other countries.
- Dec 19, 2021
- 622
- 10,528
You must be registered to see the links
I'm slowly getting a new favourite character. I absolutely love working on that 4th Monday scene. I'm not saying who it is yet, but for the people who aren't on that path, you're missing out. There's also a little more background info in there for that character.
I'm almost done though with that scene. I think 2-3 more days at most. Then I'll jump to scene 3 and leave number 2 for last.
I have a question about certain choices. There are already a few examples of those in-game, but I don't know if I should continue putting them in there or not. Here's an example:
MC has the option to peek or not and when he does, it will give negative points to a certain character. The issue I'm having is that you can easily just choose to peek, look at the renders, scroll back and choose the other option. Which I think most people do. That way you still got to see the juice whilst having no negative impact.
But if you enjoy those kinds of scenes, I'll still include them. It's up to you.
The thing I can do is to remove the negative points for that choice at that moment and maybe have it impact at a later stage where you'll then lose the points or even gain points. But not in all occasions.
Just a heads up. I'm doing that already for other choices. Sometimes giving you points and later you'll lose them and more, meaning the "negative" route was actually the better one to pick. Yes, I'm mean, I know. So don't just follow a walkthrough or mod blindly, trust your gut in some situations!
Anyway. Tell me what you think.
I mean a couple of women I've dated have thought I was cheating on them because I had to work a bunch of overtime. One told everyone I was cheating on her until she said something to someone I work with and they told her all of us were working massive overtime then tried to back peddle. The other immediately went over to the house of a guy that was trying to get in her pants for months and slept with him. The first tried to blame me for telling her exactly where I was (weird, I know) and the second one cried.......a lot.....in the middle of a street. People will take how they feel with very little proof and jump the gun.
- Jan 26, 2021
- 1,758
- 10,550
actually 75% of people who said such things have done far more then just touch boobs... but 95% of them are also already grandfathers!
- Nov 14, 2017
- 59,996
- 30,034
After these last pages of discussion, I doubted my own recollection of events. I remember biting the bullet some time ago after inquiring about the game, but never did get far into the game because the MC is just an idiot. Erynn being Erynn did not help either. As far as I remembered there was an actual rejection, but some said that other characters have a different version. So I got up to date with this version.
I read the last few pages and I have to say that there is an actual objective rejection from Erynn. There is no perception argument to be had. Even considering that every character and her grandma has a different version in the VN. It is shown that Erynn took the flower, then it is shown that she didn't. Even if she did, she just said to Ethan not to laugh in the best version of events. The point is that she never says anything to the MC. She keeping quiet is a defacto rejection.
It starts with the most basic thing, the definition:
"1a: to refuse to accept, consider, submit to, take for some purpose, or use
b: to refuse to hear, receive, or admit :".
Note that nowhere does it says that it has to be a verbal response. If I ask something from someone face to face and I get no response, it is a rejection by definition. In the best version of events, it could be argued that she did took the flower, but the flower is not in itself the declaration. For example, if someone tries to bribe you offering a gift, you take the gift but never verbally respond and never do what was asked of you, then you just accepted a gift, and no one can say you accepted a bribe.
I'll go further still.
"Social psychologists study real, imagined, and implied rejection in a variety of forms and contexts. Explicit rejection, exclusion, and ostracism are different kinds of rejection than can occur within groups or dyadic relationships of a romantic or platonic nature."
Implied rejection is exactly what I gave as an example. Example, I don't explicitly reject but never give a response, it is as simple as that. This has actual uses in interpersonal and legal relations and these uses commonly boil down to saving face or covering your own ass.
Now you are saying, V1900 you are just pulling stuff out of your ass!
Well, there is this concept of avoiding obligations, lets limit the scope to obligations I accrue on myself by just talking. If I say that I will pay for the soda of the person in front of me at the store, I just assigned an obligation on myself. What is the fastest most efficient way of avoiding it? To just shut up in the first place. This is also a way of avoiding a fuck up in an interpersonal relation. Age old tactic, I am never wrong because I never do anything.
"Sometimes avoidance occurs on the physical plane: the person abandons his family or job, but other times he hides behind indifference and silence. In those cases, the person is present, but avoids talking about the issue, usually keeping silent."
Going back to implied rejection. Why did she implicitly rejected the declaration? Erynn did in fact rejected the MC, but she did not say so verbally as to avoid being morally bound/obliged to explain herself either to her friends or the MC. Morally bound just means being bound by what is "right according to the code of behavior of a particular society", if I ask about something to someone, face to face, it is expected as a right behavior to at least get an "I don't know" in response.
So Erynn's implied rejection is for the purpose of avoiding any possibility of an obligation/moral bind of having to explain herself to her friends if they questioned her. She did not want to explain why she is involved with this weird kid, simple as that. Now some would say she has no obligation to explain herself, indeed she doesn't, no one can make her do anything, but she chooses not to adhere to that expected right behavior, she made an ethic decision that is right for her, but she also has to accept the causal effects. There is no right or wrong here it's just about making choices and owning them, consider this:
Skip time and now any argument saying she did not reject him rings like a white knight tripping over himself in real life or in the VN. I get that the drama and misunderstandings in this VN are its bread and butter, but damn trying to spin this shit as not being a rejection goes against a whole body of scientific study.
I read the last few pages and I have to say that there is an actual objective rejection from Erynn. There is no perception argument to be had. Even considering that every character and her grandma has a different version in the VN. It is shown that Erynn took the flower, then it is shown that she didn't. Even if she did, she just said to Ethan not to laugh in the best version of events. The point is that she never says anything to the MC. She keeping quiet is a defacto rejection.
It starts with the most basic thing, the definition:
You must be registered to see the links
."1a: to refuse to accept, consider, submit to, take for some purpose, or use
b: to refuse to hear, receive, or admit :".
Note that nowhere does it says that it has to be a verbal response. If I ask something from someone face to face and I get no response, it is a rejection by definition. In the best version of events, it could be argued that she did took the flower, but the flower is not in itself the declaration. For example, if someone tries to bribe you offering a gift, you take the gift but never verbally respond and never do what was asked of you, then you just accepted a gift, and no one can say you accepted a bribe.
I'll go further still.
You must be registered to see the links
."Social psychologists study real, imagined, and implied rejection in a variety of forms and contexts. Explicit rejection, exclusion, and ostracism are different kinds of rejection than can occur within groups or dyadic relationships of a romantic or platonic nature."
Implied rejection is exactly what I gave as an example. Example, I don't explicitly reject but never give a response, it is as simple as that. This has actual uses in interpersonal and legal relations and these uses commonly boil down to saving face or covering your own ass.
Now you are saying, V1900 you are just pulling stuff out of your ass!
Well, there is this concept of avoiding obligations, lets limit the scope to obligations I accrue on myself by just talking. If I say that I will pay for the soda of the person in front of me at the store, I just assigned an obligation on myself. What is the fastest most efficient way of avoiding it? To just shut up in the first place. This is also a way of avoiding a fuck up in an interpersonal relation. Age old tactic, I am never wrong because I never do anything.
You must be registered to see the links
"Sometimes avoidance occurs on the physical plane: the person abandons his family or job, but other times he hides behind indifference and silence. In those cases, the person is present, but avoids talking about the issue, usually keeping silent."
Going back to implied rejection. Why did she implicitly rejected the declaration? Erynn did in fact rejected the MC, but she did not say so verbally as to avoid being morally bound/obliged to explain herself either to her friends or the MC. Morally bound just means being bound by what is "right according to the code of behavior of a particular society", if I ask about something to someone, face to face, it is expected as a right behavior to at least get an "I don't know" in response.
So Erynn's implied rejection is for the purpose of avoiding any possibility of an obligation/moral bind of having to explain herself to her friends if they questioned her. She did not want to explain why she is involved with this weird kid, simple as that. Now some would say she has no obligation to explain herself, indeed she doesn't, no one can make her do anything, but she chooses not to adhere to that expected right behavior, she made an ethic decision that is right for her, but she also has to accept the causal effects. There is no right or wrong here it's just about making choices and owning them, consider this:
You must be registered to see the links
. Skip time and now any argument saying she did not reject him rings like a white knight tripping over himself in real life or in the VN. I get that the drama and misunderstandings in this VN are its bread and butter, but damn trying to spin this shit as not being a rejection goes against a whole body of scientific study.