Also, Otto has thirty-third hand information..and is also pressing a narrative.
We only have Dominiques (second-hand) word her mother actually died.
Tess has said they were all friends before the forming of the KG.
I do wonder where some of your thoughts actually come from or if you really do pay attention because when you fail to grasp even those simple facts (amongst many, many others), it's hard to take anything you say seriously.
Then please clear up where my confusion is:
Help me with my math: If Otto has at least 2 sources that are firsthand witnesses, what level of witness does that make him?
Luke wasn't in the helicpter crash...it was years earlier. There are no twins...Callista in hospital and the helicopter crash are literally years aapart and completely seperate events...seriously...
I do wonder where some of your thoughts actually come from or if you really do pay attention because when you fail to grasp even those simple facts (amongst many, many others), it's hard to take anything you say seriously.
Okay, I concede that apparently I have been spending too much time on this forum and not in the game, as I got it in my head that there were TWO helicopter crashes, one caused by Alexander when Callista tried to escape, and the second staged by Callista. "I don't believe this was an accident" is applicable to any vehicular crash... and several other types of "accidental" deaths. Since Callista fell unconscious in the "not accident", and remained so during the whole trip to the hospital until now, and she does not name to Dr. Smith who she wants a status update on, that means there was but one "him", and no one else, with Callista in the "not accident". Since Callista thinks about only Luke, and not Olivia, Kane, or Seth, so this "not accident" happened either before they were an entity under her care (likely considering her age), or they were otherwise inexplicably not with her. Callista confirms in Ep. 8
If Cole is so sure that Callista's escape plan will work, then their farewell at the pier has to occur before the "not accident"
You were the one who theorized Luke being a fetus. ...For one, the preferred language for an in utero death is "[we/you] lost him/her," not "he's gone" which is common language for a post-birth death, but regardless: Callista is pregnant with Kane on the eve of her escape, and far enough alone for Cole to know that it's a boy and thus name his son.
So in order for your "Luke is a fetus" theory to be correct, with the "not accident" happening after Callista left KG,
but before the "Olivia Pact" with Alexander, which itself occurs before Kane's birth, the "not accident" most logically occurred during Callista's pregnancy with Kane, and probably happened in her actual escape attempt, Luke would have to be Kane's lost twin brother. Now, it's certainly possible that Kane has a dead/lost brother, who isn't Seth, as Veronica believes Kane is Callista's only son.
All of Miles' comments and logical assumption come directly from things within the game. Maybe you should learn to start reading things more carefully and/or play all the available paths so you have all the informaiton to hand instead?
So you're saying that Miles is right in theorizing that Alexander wanted to destroy the very thing he wanted most in life: His son via Callista?
The current situation is merely a "final opportunity" to fulfill his lifelong dream.
We know that this isn't a lie Veronica is peddling.
As for Alessandra:
Since Veronica is hiding Astrid from the Board, she isn't the evidence "we (V/D/J) have". This highly suggests "invisible scars", especially considering their "mood crash" when Kane suggests that they had it easier than he can ever face.
While Alessandra admits that her father's brutality "was hard" she is not phased by it like her sisters are (who have a complete change of attitude). While she manages KG's finances, she is only sister who's not a department head, and she says that she likes it that way, believing that such stress is what keeps V/D/J from being happy. She also clarifies that her lifestyle and running the company are not the same path, and that Kane could make her life his, or "win the Gambit".
Dominique is conflicted and constantly tries to be good; she would never call herself a cruel goddess. Veronica might do cruel things, but she does them in the name of science. She doesn't revel in her cruelty, definitely wouldn't give herself a name that would boast about her cruelty.
Where do you get she's supporting Grymm? She's working with her because she has to, doesn't mean she supports her or the things she does.
As for Veronica's and Dominique's cruelty, I already have too many screenshots, so I'll just list a few. Evil is pain and death for the sake of pain and death, thus Juliette, Alessandra, and Evil Olivia/Kane inflict pain and death on others, and get a kick out of doing so. Good is mercy, forgiveness, foregoing any form of punishment, as exemplified by Good Olivia/Kane chooses. Veronica and Dominique exert the same cruelty as their sisters and Y/E occasionally minus the evil. Dominique still punishes/tortures her slaves for no reason (e.g. has a slave in her video conference room kneel in the corner all day with a metal casing covering his hold head), and gets off on inflicting pain on others (punishment during manager training). The key difference between Dominique and Juliette is that Dominique needs to maintain a "healthy" workforce, so killing or torturing to the point of work-hampering injury is going to eat away at said workforce, and it still seems time-intensive to acquire and train new replacements, so she takes the pragmatic approach of not killing too much, though she has no qualms about killing. Veronica, just look at her inventions: shock collars, shock chips, pain pads, "liquid pain", the "products" (slaves) she creates for Juliette to market (see Veronica's first scene), her direct and directed (Katsumi and Juliette) torture of Seth. GoodKane is the poster child of "not cruel", Dominique is "cruel" Veronica is "more cruel" (because at least the torture for Dominique's victims "quickly" ends), and Alessandra and Juliette are competing for "most cruel".
EDIT:
Where do you get she's supporting Grymm? She's working with her because she has to, doesn't mean she supports her or the things she does.
Callista's giving Grymm secrets and clues, and talking strategy to help her win. Do Republican donors ensure that Joe Biden is provided critical winning information, advantage, and strategy? Please point to any line(s) in the conversation that demonstrates Callista needs Grymm at all? Callista clearly has more information than Grymm. Now if you submit that Grymm and Black Mask are the same sister, then yes, I can see Callista needing Grymm, as Black Mask (Veronica) is her agent running the entire Gambit from within. If they are separate, then Grymm makes no contribution, outside of complaining about Elena, instead Callista provides her everything.
If Callista's ultimate goal is to ensure that Kane survives/wins the Gambit, and she knows exactly how the sisters are, then would she ever tell a sister, whom she doesn't want her son to end up with, to therefore turn Kane into that sister's direction?