- Oct 9, 2017
- 2,310
- 2,741
Right? I hate that.I've found the best place to have a review is the top listing on the first, oldest page....because F95 always sends us there instead of actual latest review!
Right? I hate that.I've found the best place to have a review is the top listing on the first, oldest page....because F95 always sends us there instead of actual latest review!
The only people who will read your comment are those who are already following the thread though.I've found the best place to have a review is the top listing on the first, oldest page....because F95 always sends us there instead of actual latest review!
wait...Macy's boobs are diferent sizes? i never noticed....Cuz people here think with their diks man, everyone one in this site (not this thread) only think a VN is good because it has a nude slut with 4 fingers spreading her pussy on the front cover, meanwhile the girls might not seem that pretty, the dev did a mighty damn fine job in the script department to make us players care for the girls, i myself am very fond of Denise
PS: But dev make some boobjob scene for Macy, i cant stand diferent sized boobs
Oh you lucky bastard, i've been waiting since last year for the next update and you discovered this amazing game when a new update is just around the corner!I'm almost mad that after a good year or so playing every adult VN I came across that I only just found this one now. This should be at the top of every "story-driven VN" list. I know not everyone likes the character models that don't look like typical VN bimbos but it's such a breath of fresh air to have women with actual ethnic traits and not just some model that was obviously supposed to be caucasian but colored brown. I'm sure I'm not saying anything new but there's no way I'm going to read through 350 pages of posts. I just wanted to voice my appreciation for real quality that is so very rarely seen in your average VN.
Thats not altering them. Thats an enhancementNo one will alter Macy's boobs in any way?
Ha! Jokes on you!
Her boobs will get bigger and even more lopsided when she gets pregnant!
Every wednesday we get a progress updatem, in the previous page there's the update for this week.how long to get update on this? does any one have an idea?
still super hot, I wouldn't mind making her more babies...Kinda? Maybe? Ten years and four kids later?
View attachment 1318433
Even if you did 'feel it', I can't imagine any scenario where ntr in this story would logically work. You would have to re-write all three main characters. It's like asking "will there be any futa content"?Well, hopefully laying this matter to rest: I don't deny anyone their kink, but as Meyele already pointed out, there will be no NTR in LomL. For anyone that's disappointed by that: I'm sorry, I just don't feel that particular one, and if I don't feel it, I can't write about it.
Well, will there be any futa content?Even if you did 'feel it', I can't imagine any scenario where ntr in this story would logically work. You would have to re-write all three main characters. It's like asking "will there be any futa content"?
I imagine there were Mutually exclusive paths from the onset right? I seem to remember there being some intention in a specific direction, at the very least, it was always the plan that you could avoid Macy and Denise in a sexual sense. That said, I could be misremembering. I remember initially going for... the lady from your office, i forgot her name (Brooke!), then going "Wait! Denise hates her! Oh no!" and I went back and changed the path. Obviously it's clear now that you can safely go for her. My thought is that the choice in the game always felt fluffy and light. It was obvious to me that they were rather superfluous. It's obviously intentional to me because if they did have an impact it would be SOOOOOO annoying to do a walkthrough. I like it cause it helps give an illusion of choice that doesn't piss you off and give you the voice/intention behind what you want the MC to be.Note from NaughtyRoad: I make it a point to telegraph dangerous choices and keep you on the rails. Also, there's no mutually exclusive paths, so no need to hold off on any character out of fear of missing out with another.
I really recommend you try it without walkthrough or walk through mod on your first play and trust that I won't try to fuck you over with surprise lockouts/endings.
It was all of the posts in the NTR discussion, aside from naughtyroad's which somehow isn't off topic. Not trying to start anything but it does make it seem like his comment comes out of nowhere.Frustrating to have something deleted as "off topic," but to not remember what it could have been. My first thought was this comment, but here it is...
Well, with mutual exclusives, e.g. choose girl A->lose girl B, but choose girl B->lose girl A: those aren't in there because frankly, I feel it's a waste of time to create scenes for girl A and B, and by average have only see 50% of the audience see that work. So there's exclusion paths, but they only exclude people you have no interest in, they won't result in seeing content you wouldn't see otherwise (except where it modifies dialogue to reflect that choice). That idea of not doing mutually exclusive paths was there from the outset.Hopefully this is a pertinent question naughtyroad, but I wanted to ask about your original intentions on paths/routes. (...)
I mean, they can work in some cases but it has to be done exceptionally well I think, or the dev has to have some thick skin and be prepared for the backlash, I'm sure you could but please don't .because someone decided hard choices are fun, and that they make for good drama.
As a developer, I think you must stay true to your vision and what you like. Trying to appeal to everyone is a losing battle - imho. Here's to more of your continued success.Well, with mutual exclusives, e.g. choose girl A->lose girl B, but choose girl B->lose girl A: those aren't in there because frankly, I feel it's a waste of time to create scenes for girl A and B, and by average have only see 50% of the audience see that work. So there's exclusion paths, but they only exclude people you have no interest in, they won't result in seeing content you wouldn't see otherwise (except where it modifies dialogue to reflect that choice). That idea of not doing mutually exclusive paths was there from the outset.
As to fluffy and light, IDK. I mean, you can choose to pursue her if you like her, and if not, you don't have to deal with her much, so there's an impact, and it'll influence a ton of dialogue with Macy/Denise but also with the other office ladies if you do, (and that's a huge impact from the scripting side), so there's consequence and meaning to the choice.
But I understand the deeper question here: are there Consequences (capital C) to the choice? No, and by design. Dire consequences might be fun if you're playing the Witcher, but in a VN, it's just cockblocking (or cuntblocking, depending on the player).
I really hate the idea of having to choose between love interests because someone decided hard choices are fun, and that they make for good drama. I don't think they do, I think they're a kneejerk reaction to what the developer feels makes good normal games, but I feel it's misplaced in the erotic/adult VN genre, especially for a game like this. If there are consequences (lower case) to choices, they should be clear to the player up front, and avoidable, otherwise, you're just setting the player up to be frustrated.
Somewhat related, I wrote a whole bunch on choices here.
So, coming back to your original question: yeah, that was my intention from the beginning, although I couldn't have imagined LomL would turn out to be so massive, so I hadn't foreseen it all playing out in this way exactly (just the broad strokes).
Dangerous choices: those are the choices that lock out Macy&Denise. The game will tell you what you're about to choose there so you can avoid it, or it'll hide those choices entirely if you so choose so you don't have the immersion breaking "WARNING" in your dialog.