- Feb 4, 2019
- 133
- 138
No, you don't, that's exactly what I was talking about being wrong with the walkthrough. The day number literally does not matter. Find Samara in her tent and talk to her. If she's not there, go back on another day. The events in this game, other than a few one off things like Samara and Nell's arrival, are cyclical.Ah, shoot. Now I have to go back from day 22 all over again. Thanks for the tip
Nobody is bitching about anything. A fan of NTR asked where it was, they assumed with it having an NTR tag it would have such content.Oh joy we're back to the good old days of bitching about NTR. How fantastic.
Gold or copper? Because silver and gold are not actually implemented and are likely to be removed.When I go to the crone to train spellcasting she asks for 15 copper and 6 uses of Invade Mind. I have more than that in gold and have used invade 7 times but my only option is to refuse to pay. Am I missing something or is it a bug?
The 15 copper training session only requires 3 uses of invade mind. The one after that requires 30 copper pieces and 6 uses of invade mind.When I go to the crone to train spellcasting she asks for 15 copper and 6 uses of Invade Mind. I have more than that in gold and have used invade 7 times but my only option is to refuse to pay. Am I missing something or is it a bug?
Some people say the Thaddius scenes (before you start getting with Evelyn) are NTR. They are not, but you know...wait this game has ntr ? The only type of NTR i see is netori, and that's not really the NTR people are afraid of, isn't it ? Unless i miss something, i never tried the sex friend route with primose so idk
No, it doesn't. It's not nor has it ever been an NTR game.wait this game has ntr ? The only type of NTR i see is netori, and that's not really the NTR people are afraid of, isn't it ? Unless i miss something, i never tried the sex friend route with primose so idk
By the definition of the tag on the forum (sexual scene between two npcs intended to cause jealousy in the player), it qualifies. We could certainly argue the finer points of the term NTR itself, but in the case of the tag, it's inclusion is proper by the forum rules.Some people say the Thaddius scenes (before you start getting with Evelyn) are NTR. They are not, but you know...
Blame the hentai artists in Japan who shifted the general meaning from couples cheating to crush or some close person that you'd might harbor some feelings getting fucked being an NTR as well. That's what gave those whiners a foundation.No, it doesn't. It's not nor has it ever been an NTR game.
It has a couple of scenes with the sister and Thad. Some people complained about that until the tag was added.
That's where the term originated, though (that is, within the ero media community). It's a neologism that appeared only in the late 90s surrounding ero VNs and doujinshi. The content it was used to describe is older than the term itself. An established relationship is not needed, but there needs to be mutual affection (without mutual affection, it's called BSS). Given the informal nature of the term though, there's argument about it everywhere. Especially the BSS scenarios are recently parodied heavily in media as a form of entitlement.Blame the hentai artists in Japan who shifted the general meaning from couples cheating to crush or some close person that you'd might harbor some feelings getting fucked being an NTR as well. That's what gave those whiners a foundation.
:sigh: Mostly, I get that, however it happens to be defined, there are people for whom it's a huge squick, and others for whom it's a huge turn on. As someone for whom it's neither, the endless (frequently heated) conversations in just about every thread about what does and doesn't constitute NTR/netorare/netori/whatever get more than a bit tedious. Which I am willing if not happy to admit is my problem.That's where the term originated, though (that is, within the ero media community). It's a neologism that appeared only in the late 90s surrounding ero VNs and doujinshi. The content it was used to describe is older than the term itself. An established relationship is not needed, but there needs to be mutual affection (without mutual affection, it's called BSS). Given the informal nature of the term though, there's argument about it everywhere. Especially the BSS scenarios are recently parodied heavily in media as a form of entitlement.
The issue is that the word does not accurately describe what people like or dislike, which is why there is an argument. It would be much simpler if people just said things like "I don't like seeing a potential love interest have sex with someone else" or "I like to see the MC's wife get corrupted by having sex with another man". People just like to lean on terms in order to get more people in their "group" because there is greater overlap. If they are using a "term" then they look less willful as it's something common enough to enter language:sigh: Mostly, I get that, however it happens to be defined, there are people for whom it's a huge squick, and others for whom it's a huge turn on. As someone for whom it's neither, the endless (frequently heated) conversations in just about every thread about what does and doesn't constitute NTR/netorare/netori/whatever get more than a bit tedious. Which I am willing if not happy to admit is my problem.
I get that, honestly, and I agree, the imprecision of the language is a problem. (We can talk about the philosophical problem of language's imperfection in general another day. )The issue is that the word does not accurately describe what people like or dislike, which is why there is an argument. It would be much simpler if people just said things like "I don't like seeing a potential love interest have sex with someone else" or "I like to see the MC's wife get corrupted by having sex with another man". People just like to lean on terms in order to get more people in their "group" because there is greater overlap. If they are using a "term" then they look less willful as it's something common enough to enter language