- Sep 30, 2018
- 3,402
- 8,858
I still think he made fake patreon accounts and he's paying himself to launder money.
He's just one of the old devs. They all make a lot of money.
I still think he made fake patreon accounts and he's paying himself to launder money.
dev stated July 14th ish?, but, I'll believe it when it happens, until then,...who knowswhen will the next update be released?
Thanks, I must have missed something with herYes. At level 5 you can have a foursomee with Sara, Lily and Agnes, a new classmate of Sara. Totally worth it.
Man, that was a sarcasm there's no new content with Sara and you can't reach level 5 right now or in near future 1 or 2 years probably)Thanks, I must have missed something with her
I think this is completely incorrect. Every work by default has a copyright. Giving up the details don't matter. Even so, you could be sued and in that case, EVEN IF YOU ARE RIGHT, it is going to cost a lots of money and guess who has been milking it for years...I saw in here that someone stated that there would be a possible lawsuit if another dev took over this project:
1. The project in question must be already copywrite.
2. The author cannot claim copywrite infringement if the details of the project are given away freely. i.e. how to make Linda, Caroline, Sarah and others. On his Discord server they offer this openly.
So, no, he cannot bring a suit against anyone who tries to do a unofficial remake of the game. If this were the case, anyone who gave to his cause could possibly do the same against him.
NOTICE: I am no lawyer by any means, I just know about this crap due to my research when I wanted to do my own game.
Sounds like micro-updates (previous updates were 2k picts or so) , and if i remember correctly he could drop a tiny update 0.7 just finishing up the part with Barrons work." minimal sizes of each update will be 200 images and 20 animations"
Looks more like he hasnt done anything
I've done itThis guy is harmful to the whole adult community and has to be stopped you can clearly see his method getting more and more popular among the scammers, suddenly more & more milkers appear who use his formula.
Step 1 go toYou must be registered to see the links
Step 2 click on "Report this Creator"
View attachment 1259752
Step 3 choose the reason of the report.
View attachment 1259755
Step 4. click at "This creator is not being honest"
View attachment 1259756
Step 5. here choose "This creator is not fulfilling their rewards or "is not creating anymore" both options fits in this case
View attachment 1259757
It states: that to fix this issue you have to contact to creator bla bla but don't let that make you insecure.
View attachment 1259758
Nevertheless, Patreon does record the report, even if it looks like the attempt will go nowhere here you see after many people reported it didn't hurt him:
View attachment 1259774
If you have a better idea please let me know, btw the mods have made the right decision to put the abandoned tag, which set a sign that did not go by without a trace to ShillStore.
Quoting for truth.This whole situation is hilarious, by the way...
"This game is abandoned, put the tag on it!"
"Pfff. It won't make any difference. ICSTOR doesn't care about F95...."
[ICSTOR repeatedly posts a "progress update" every 3 months, right before it would qualify for the abandoned tag]
"He's abusing the rules to avoid the tag!"
"Pffff. He doesn't care about F95..."
[Misses 3 month deadline, game is marked as abandoned. Within hours, he actually shows up on his Discord for the first time in forever]
"The game isn't abandoned! I'll talk to you all now. I've been working this whole time, but in a month, I'll have an update containing a month's worth of rushed work!"
"Pfff. He doesn't care about F95..."
So the bigger the update the bigger the version number. Next version will be... 0.71.The naming of each version will be different depending on the size of the update, so the second update in July can be called v.0.75. The bigger the update the bigger the version number difference up until it finally gets to version 1.0.
The devil is always in the details, and in this case it is. Copywrite is NOT by default, it has to be pursued by submitting a claim to the Federal copywrite Office (USA), once there the copywrite office will see if there is someone else who has the same copywrite, if not then they award you the ownership LEGALY, if there is you're SOL. As I stated earlier, I researched all my options when I was going to do my game. In the USA this is how it is, no assumption on if I make it I can sue, you have to complete the process by filing for a patent , a copywrite if you will.I think this is completely incorrect. Every work by default has a copyright. Giving up the details don't matter. Even so, you could be sued and in that case, EVEN IF YOU ARE RIGHT, it is going to cost a lots of money and guess who has been milking it for years...
I don't know but every article I have googled basically say whatThe devil is always in the details, and in this case it is. Copywrite is NOT by default, it has to be pursued by submitting a claim to the Federal copywrite Office (USA), once there the copywrite office will see if there is someone else who has the same copywrite, if not then they award you the ownership LEGALY, if there is you're SOL. As I stated earlier, I researched all my options when I was going to do my game. In the USA this is how it is, no assumption on if I make it I can sue, you have to complete the process by filing for a patent , a copywrite if you will.
and here is what I ment when I said the Devil is in the details:I don't know but every article I have googled basically say whatYou must be registered to see the linksalso Youtube copyright lawyer Lawful Masses echo the same principles in many videos. Only thing might be that the title needs to be trademarked to be protected. Again I am not a layer but everything points out that the game has automatic copyright and any "fan versions" could be easily counted as acting as market replacement (and would be thus infricment of copyright).
Is that any reason to remove a post just asking a question? How hard would it have been to just say exactly what you just said instead of deleting the post?It wasn't marked abandoned because he had given progress updates within the 3-month deadline, every time, until now. The first deadline he missed, and it was marked abandoned. If you're going to come up with a "theory", at least do some research on it....