Completely agree. In fact, that kind of external influence, and worse, is pretty much pervasive nowadays (ESG system). The thing is, what we are saying is not mutually exclusive. The cultural context is what it is, and what it has been for years now. The fact that those "motivated" actors I was talking about are even accepted, or tolerated after some time, speaks volumes. I mentioned Indiegogo and Kickstarter because I'm a comic book fan who's been pretty much forced to buy either indie comics or manga, and I've seen the way those platforms have been acting against certain authors who happen not to be perfectly aligned with the dominant intersectional approach to fiction. No spicy stuff, no extreme violent content—just regular superhero action and fantasy, yet, at best, their campaigns get shadowbanned and, at worst, they are booted from the platform.In all corners of life, money overrides ideological concerns nearly every time. One or two zealots might join up to someplace like Patreon with fanatical goals of ridding it of smut, but in the end the people in charge will always accept legal money. The payment processors are the same way: for years, Visa, Mastercard, Paypal, and so on cheerfully processed payments to Pornhub, Xvideos, and many other openly pornographic websites.
What changed was the scope. Patreon got big enough to attract the attention of governments and moral activist groups who weren't thrilled about legally-iffy topics like incest, bestiality, and the like. Everybody loves money, but nobody loves law enforcement attention, major media articles, or Congressional subpoenas. The NY Times expose on Pornhub's shitty moderation allowing revenge porn to stay up (again at the behest of an anti-porn group) furthered this chill and caused the payment processors to think twice about working with adult content. Given the choice between taking a stance and having the larger business threatened, they'll always side with the business. It's also why Tumblr, Imgur, and (soon) Reddit are moving away from porn, because investors in their upcoming IPOs don't want any unwanted attention from anti-porn groups either.
TL;DR: You don't fuck with the money. If smut fucks with the money, smut loses.
The political and media pressure you described so well is a major direct factor, but it also had the unfortunate side effect of empowering certain kind of activist who might be able to find his/her way into a position of power at a company. When that happens, you can be sure they will act. And they will be both thorough and petty beyond belief.
Last edited: