All I got was "Moderation staff issued you a warning for Innapropriate Review for 0 points". No further explanation, that's why I asked.
It's interesting that I appearently COULD have rated the game 1 star, just saying "it sucks", but the mere mention of the counterbalancing thing makes the whole review inappropriate. You COULD have asked me to remove it from the review, which I think otherwise went great lengths to explain my line of reasoning.
Doesn't matter, I'm not arguing the rules here, if you think that's how it should be done, then that is how it is done.
I merely was interested in the line of reasoning so I don't make the same mistake again in the future.
Edit: rootbeerfloat I'm editing this into this post because I don't want to turn this thread into an argument about how to review or whatnot. As I said, I just wanted to know the why, and I got the answer. Otherwise, I'll not spoil this thread any further. Could you please cease the hostilities now? Thanks.
Edit2: Tristrix: Unless I'm misremembering, I think I wrote it would be three or four stars if you didn't care about the things that made it a one star game for me (which I explained at great length). For me, it IS a one star game, it would be three or four if I was trying to be objective, which I was not, my review was obviously subjective. Regardless, y'all got your way, the game's score stays up there and my voice is silenced. Can we all go our seperate ways in peace now?
It's interesting that I appearently COULD have rated the game 1 star, just saying "it sucks", but the mere mention of the counterbalancing thing makes the whole review inappropriate. You COULD have asked me to remove it from the review, which I think otherwise went great lengths to explain my line of reasoning.
Doesn't matter, I'm not arguing the rules here, if you think that's how it should be done, then that is how it is done.
I merely was interested in the line of reasoning so I don't make the same mistake again in the future.
Edit: rootbeerfloat I'm editing this into this post because I don't want to turn this thread into an argument about how to review or whatnot. As I said, I just wanted to know the why, and I got the answer. Otherwise, I'll not spoil this thread any further. Could you please cease the hostilities now? Thanks.
Edit2: Tristrix: Unless I'm misremembering, I think I wrote it would be three or four stars if you didn't care about the things that made it a one star game for me (which I explained at great length). For me, it IS a one star game, it would be three or four if I was trying to be objective, which I was not, my review was obviously subjective. Regardless, y'all got your way, the game's score stays up there and my voice is silenced. Can we all go our seperate ways in peace now?
Last edited: