- Sep 3, 2020
- 1,897
- 14,001
Patreons tooso steam will get it's own version of the game or you'll censored it for your patreons too?
View attachment 3022341
Patreons tooso steam will get it's own version of the game or you'll censored it for your patreons too?
View attachment 3022341
You might be interested in reading the author's words about the main character.
https://f95zone.to/threads/summers-gone-ch-4-5-full-oceanlab.29981/post-7801662
So yeah, while now the MC isn't the complete psycho he was in the original version of the game before the remake, and who some people in this thread miss so much, he's still a bit of a jerk. You can control and change his dark side to some extent, but you can't completely get rid of it. This is not a mistake or a bad writing, the character is well written and the author meant him to be exactly like this. Maybe because of these contradictions in his personality, this MC seems so interesting to many people in this thread.
I...uh...was intriguedOr you can be a cocky jerk that wonders why that big boobed girl in the wheelchair still likes you after a story of you snorting coke from Miss Hill's ass went live in order to fight your hangover and be able to play.
Ye Gads, then what are a pair of testicles with single pimples on the bottom?If to think about it, butts are the same as tits, only without nipples.
A bogeyman for music rights owners?Ye Gads, then what are a pair of testicles with single pimples on the bottom?
Yer fekkin priceless, mister.A bogeyman for music rights owners?
This is where you are wrong. This is not my definition, but a television standard.Well, that's all good, but it's only YOUR definition of porn. Care to try convincing whoever is threatening to pull Ocean's license? Because their definition is the only one that counts for the purpose of that license.
You don't seem to understand me. I didn't say Ocean was the problem. The problem is that some erotic shots are deleted, others are left. This seems very strange to me. It must be all or nothing removed.The problem is NOT Ocean, it is the mercurial wims of service providers who withdraw paid services with little notice - in this case music licensing - because of an aversion to adult content.
This has been an issue for over a year and has badly affected many AVN developers who treat music and sound as an integral part of their games.
The last several pages of this thread are filled with posts complaining about Ocean and what he has to do to comprise, despite user posts (and numerous development logs by Ocean) clearly explaining the situation. SHM.
Two considerations: Ocean wishes to leave as much of what he has worked on in the game as he can. He has plenty of material to work on going forward that I'm sure he just wants to be at the next stage already.You don't seem to understand me. I didn't say Ocean was the problem. The problem is that some erotic shots are deleted, others are left. This seems very strange to me. It must be all or nothing removed.
These two options are not logical.Two considerations: Ocean wishes to leave as much of what he has worked on in the game as he can. He has plenty of material to work on going forward that I'm sure he just wants to be at the next stage already.
Secondly, most of these licensing companys have pretty obscure terms, and they're not always located in the same country as the person wanting to obtain licenses. How would you (as a one person business starting out) make sure that the terms obey international norms? Even if they do, if you recieve a cease and desist style notification that you know is a break of their terms, how will you even pay to take a foreign company to court over it? Where is the jurisdiction? It's usually in their place of business.
These are not options or alternatives, these are bits of information that might help explain why not everything is being cut - Ocean is doing the bare minimum to meet the terms he has to.These two options are not logical.
1 - well, this action makes no sense at all.
2 - But here you are very mistaken. If there is a prohibition, it is always clearly stated. There are 2 genres: erotica and porn. They may ban either porn or porn and erotica. But Ocean turns out that porn is prohibited, but no one has banned erotica. Why then does he remove some of the erotica and leave some behind?
that will happen regardless of what Ocean does, just the words will be differentsome uptight people will leave nasty words lying around on steam etc.
imagine having clear licenses and not something likeThese two options are not logical.
1 - well, this action makes no sense at all.
2 - But here you are very mistaken. If there is a prohibition, it is always clearly stated. There are 2 genres: erotica and porn. They may ban either porn or porn and erotica. But Ocean turns out that porn is prohibited, but no one has banned erotica. Why then does he remove some of the erotica and leave some behind?
one of the music licensing services said:Pornography and extremely violent content are not covered by our license.
XXXXXXX's terms for proper use can easily be defined as content that can be played in a public theater or broadcast network which is available to a general audience
at least the first one bans porn explicitlyanother one said:No illegal, immoral or political content.
...
Moreover, you may not use the Licensed Works in connection with sensitive subjects without the prior written consent of XXXXXXXXXXXXXX. Sensitive subjects include, but are not limited to, political content, such as the promotion, advertisement or endorsement of any party, candidate or elected official; and “adult videos” and promotion of adult entertainment venues, escort services, or the like.
In Afghanistan?This is where you are wrong. This is not my definition, but a television standard.
It's probably a bulk license deal, so it's all or nothing - if there is something that the company feels violates their terms, they'll not just pull a song from that scene, but all their licenses. Ocean probably doesn't want it to be more of a headache than it already has been.I have played this game more than is considered socially acceptable. At no point did I ever think, "Wow, this song is incredible," or "This scene would not work without this background music." More often than not, I push pause or mute the music altogether because it gets annoying, especially when the mood is dark and the song is a bouncy, pop song. I have only played two games where the songs were very specific and part of the story. The rest get muted.
I understand that Ocean derives some creative inspiration from hearing some of the music. I am a musician and I completely operate with that mechanic in my personal life. How these particular songs give him that creative drive to write those particular scenes, well, that will just have to be one of the universe's mysteries. But I can safely say, I will never choose this license holder and subscription service to provide music for any game I make. They have hurt too many good devs and cost them a large amount of money and time.
I am happy to hear that the impact of this season is minimal. However, I would venture a guess that Ocean has spent a considerable amount of time dealing with the issue as it is. It makes no sense to me why he would continue to patronize the company by cutting those scenes (or specific images in a scene) to comply with the license instead of cutting the music out entirely. But it isn't my game.
Fortunately, we are days away from an update release. I have so many questions I hope will get answered. Especially what happens next after those two kisses!
The content image changes are for the Steam release in order to open the story up to a broader audience. The changes are minor and analogous to when a movie has a couple of small cuts to get a PG-13 rating instead of an R rating to have a better box office. Some people are freaking out about it because the next release will not have something in it that they had before, not realizing that they are perfectly able to keep the old version installed if they want to beat off to seeing Nika's dick in the jacuzzi.I only read last 2 pages of comments so i may have the wrong impression about what is going on with this censored content. I mean the game is so far focused on character development and has very little sexual scenes. Now to censor what little there is, is not good. Story and characters are important, but most of the people want to see something lewd eventually. As i said i do not have the time to read every comment, so i may have misread something, but removing lewd scenes is a very bad idea, if that is what the problem is. If the problem is music, i would rather the game had none, than to remove naked scenes.
Yeah that's a thought I've had these last days. Probably one or two pussy shots will be altered too, but my goodness with the fixation there's been with his dick vanishing from our screensSome people are freaking out about it because the next release will not have something in it that they had before, not realizing that they are perfectly able to keep the old version installed if they want to beat off to seeing Nika's dick in the jacuzzi.
Do you even realize how ridiculous this is? Since when can contracts be changed without the consent of both parties? I can imagine how happy employers will be if this happens. They will promise millions, and when payday comes, they will change the contracts and pay a couple of dollars.The problem is that the prohibition was added while Ocean had a license - once his license expired, he couldn't relicense the music without cuts. Terms and conditions change all the time, and it usually takes effect on renewal.
It doesn't matter how strict the rules are. The important thing is that they must be fulfilled; if you don’t want to fulfill them, then the lawyers will leave you without your pants. It’s the same with Ocean, if there is a ban, then everything needs to be removed. If some of the nude scenes are left in and some are removed, it would be like breaking a contract.Have you ever looked into music or sound effects licensing? It's pretty convoluted, especially since all these licnesing aggregator companies popped up. Consider that if the licensing company is located in Iran, it might have stricter terms than one based in the Netherlands. Then there are the terms of the content owner, who puts it up - they might have strict terms or the might have none. What often happens is new creators make it available for everything, and once they start finding out their music is used in porn, they get upset and change the terms. The companies that do this licensing are often of drifting between regulations by making up their own terms on the fly and having clauses that seem fair, but really allow them to reserve their rights in any situation.