using the same logic i can say man don't benefit from being rich
No. You cannot. There is zero logic in that statement.
For a start, there is a fundamental difference between the 2 positions.
Being rich brings numerous benefits to a person with, or without a partner.
Hymen restoration doesn't.
Yes, you often see better looking women with rich men, but that's not the only benefit to wealth & it's a bit daft to suggest otherwise.
To be fair, it's debateable whether that type of gold-digging woman is actually a benefit, at all.
If she wouldn't look at you when you were poor but she wants you now that you're rich, then she's not interested in you, just your money and status.
She's a mercenary with a cunt for sale to the highest bidder.
The benefit of being rich directly applies to anyone who has access to the funds. Quite obviously.
If you're rich, you do not have to worry where your next meal is coming from, or how to pay that bill.
You have higher levels of disposable income.
You have access to better (higher costing) services, such as private healthcare.
You do not suffer from the same financial restrictions as those with less money.
Absolutely clear benefits that apply, irrespective of having a partner.
Having a false virginity restored provides nothing to the woman, other than making her seem more desireable to a man wo wants that in his partner.
There are no medical or health benefits for her.
Ergo there is no benefit, without a man who desires his partner to (cosmetically) be a virgin.
Even then, it's fake. She's not a virgin. She's had a cock inside her before. It's just a vanity project, for the man.
Being rich is real. Relative, but real.