I'm actually a little disappointed I can't get this running via steam proton out the box. Maybe it's cause he rolled his own engine.
- Thread starter Muff Diver
- Start date
You can run it with regular wine in a 32-bit prefix and installing corefonts and dotnet462 with winetricks.
- Nov 4, 2017
- 384
- 239
Anybody got a fix for the Doge Mod? Rex does not appear for me.
>Jen is a character in a game Total Seduction. She is a first randomly generated character in the game. That means, each time the game starts, she will look different (however her appearance will remain the same during the gameplay). If you don't like her look and you have cheat codes active through the premium code, you can change her look randomly any time by pressing Ctrl+R.
Is it possible to customize Jen's appearance manually?
And what about other characters? Maybe someone with a capable hands can create a mod for characters appearance customization? Meant the body/face, not just the color of skin/hair/lips
Is it possible to customize Jen's appearance manually?
And what about other characters? Maybe someone with a capable hands can create a mod for characters appearance customization? Meant the body/face, not just the color of skin/hair/lips
no, you can only fully customize holly at the library with all the options it gives but that's it.
is there a way to change the dialogue? would like to "mod" it so you arent referedas a male anymore, if you play futa or strap-on.
You can edit text files in data/language/english/actors
- Mar 9, 2019
- 418
- 401
Hmmm, I don't know if ugly graphics are a kink... If so, I don't wanna be the one to kink shame here... but...
How on earth are there people saying it's a great game?, good graphics!
Madness
I've never seen such deplorable renders(graphics). Made in 2017? It's quite discombobulating to think that it was made in 2017 and wasn't made in 2000 and uploaded in 2017...
*Rocking back and forth* It's all satire *Rocking back and forth*
Yes, yes, it must be satire!
How on earth are there people saying it's a great game?, good graphics!
Madness
I've never seen such deplorable renders(graphics). Made in 2017? It's quite discombobulating to think that it was made in 2017 and wasn't made in 2000 and uploaded in 2017...
*Rocking back and forth* It's all satire *Rocking back and forth*
Yes, yes, it must be satire!
Last edited:
- May 1, 2018
- 2,389
- 6,817
- Aug 6, 2016
- 289
- 226
- Mar 9, 2019
- 418
- 401
What do you mean by fit into your profile pic. I mean, I would agree in most cases. Yeah, the whole pic is just cut out. Your being sarcastic as to the mouth of the girl being cut out in my pic!
Although it's a bit of an odd thing to comment about the mouth or image of a profile pic not fitting into frame.
As you so clearly being sarcastic, you could of made it more obvious for people by saying perhaps, "wow you really do fit into your profile pic, don't you". (Indirect quote).
I send my deepest regrets and apologies if my profile pic's missing mouth has offended you dear sir! I will try and improve next time.
You take care now!
just why are you complaining about the graphs? Ok, awful graphs for 2017... and?
This game has progression, and, duh, game, fucking, play.
You know that stuff? Game, fucking, play. The stuff that you usually don't get in rnpy games. And it's not another generic rpg maker mechanic.
It's original, for the less. And it stud up to be an interesting original. At least for those who liked it.
You must be new here (in gaming, not just nsfw gaming)
let me get you in on a (little) secret
This shithole of a conflict about "man doz graphs are dinosaur aged" is abundant, and irritating. Your critique is as misplaced as if you'd critique a movie for not having fancy marvel like top noch computer added animation.
Graphs is just one aspect of a computer game. And, while despite this kind of graph people say it's a great game... doesn't that mean the game gets right other aspects what makes a computer game good?
At least for those who liked it.
So not that I'm necessarily defending the other person, but this really isn't "just" a game site: the vast majority of games here are of the... adult and erotic persuasion. I understand that graphics aren't everything, but if people can complain about graphics in Lab Rats 2 then there is certainly an argument to be made that an older game that looks (at least according to the front page of this thread) worse than the sims may not exactly hit people's buttons. Sure, the gameplay might be super in-depth and the writing could be really hot and get people excited, but if next to that you see two stick figures going at it then you aren't exactly going to praise the images (either that or you get a stick figure kink).
I guess since I may be in a similar boat as the person above this comment, could anyone link a screenshot of how the game looks nowadays, or does it still look like the models from the first version of LifePlay? I mean, the 3 images in the first post are a group of badly scaled and pixelated women, and a guy with what looks like a grandmother in the other two (both of which are also incredibly tiny and hard to see). For pure wank material, not exactly something that pulls someone in enough to consider playing before they enjoy the game, especially since this isn't a game that has in-depth gameplay and story and just so 'happens' to have sex, a lot of the end game stuff is having a giant harem room with porn and sex. Graphics aren't a "be-all-end-all" in a porn game (I played Corruption of Champions and did it without the image packs for a long time), but if it does have graphics then that is still a part of the game.
- Aug 6, 2016
- 289
- 226
You are really proving that you are representative of your profile pic.
- Mar 9, 2019
- 418
- 401
I can see your point; it's not just graphics that make a game good. That's a given. However, for a modern game to have bad graphics it has to have amazing game play. Which, for small creators like these is often hard (Funding,skill and time).
If you don't have good graphics you need something to really pull it up: like story or as you mentioned game play.
I'm saying the graphics are shit here. Am I wrong? I don't think so...
I get what you mean. The "These graphics are shit" argument has been repeated Ad nauseam. Sure, my arguments not at all original and can be seen as really ignorant, but I'm not wrong am I? Saying my argument is wrong because the game is good at X is rather silly. A game could have a shit story and awesome graphics: If someone comes along and says the games graphics are great! What a great game! The game in question is shit because of its ineptitude at writing,pacing or one other story elements. However, the game can also be seen as great because of its graphics.
The way I worded my critique was by no means fair. Game graphics bad, game = shit. Something like that.
I think that people make a choice weather to acknowledge certain problems within games if it has things they like. Then when someone points out a problem stating that game is bad because of its graphics and the poster does not say anything about how good the story is or something else, they end up saying that the critique is invalid. Due to them only seeing the bad and not the good.
I know I've gone on a bit of a rant as to why I made this argument, but hope that the point still comes across...
The original statement, 'game = shit because of graphs' still stands tho...
Last edited:
and you're welcome to pass by and find yourself a game better suiting your preferences.
Last edited: