just why are you complaining about the graphs? Ok, awful graphs for 2017... and?
This game has progression, and, duh, game, fucking, play.
You know that stuff? Game, fucking, play. The stuff that you usually don't get in rnpy games. And it's not another generic rpg maker mechanic.
It's original, for the less. And it stud up to be an interesting original. At least for those who liked it.
You must be new here (in gaming, not just nsfw gaming)
let me get you in on a (little) secret
This shithole of a conflict about "man doz graphs are dinosaur aged" is abundant, and irritating. Your critique is as misplaced as if you'd critique a movie for not having fancy marvel like top noch computer added animation.
Graphs is just one aspect of a computer game. And, while despite this kind of graph people say it's a great game... doesn't that mean the game gets right other aspects what makes a computer game good?
At least for those who liked it.
I can see your point; it's not just graphics that make a game good. That's a given. However, for a modern game to have bad graphics it has to have amazing game play. Which, for small creators like these is often hard (Funding,skill and time).
If you don't have good graphics you need something to really pull it up: like story or as you mentioned game play.
I'm saying the graphics are shit here. Am I wrong? I don't think so...
I get what you mean. The "These graphics are shit" argument has been repeated Ad nauseam. Sure, my arguments not at all original and can be seen as really ignorant, but I'm not wrong am I? Saying my argument is wrong because the game is good at X is rather silly. A game could have a shit story and awesome graphics: If someone comes along and says the games graphics are great! What a great game! The game in question is shit because of its ineptitude at writing,pacing or one other story elements. However, the game can also be seen as great because of its graphics.
The way I worded my critique was by no means fair. Game graphics bad, game = shit. Something like that.
I think that people make a choice weather to acknowledge certain problems within games if it has things they like. Then when someone points out a problem stating that game is bad because of its graphics and the poster does not say anything about how good the story is or something else, they end up saying that the critique is invalid. Due to them only seeing the bad and not the good.
I know I've gone on a bit of a rant as to why I made this argument, but hope that the point still comes across...
The original statement, 'game = shit because of graphs' still stands tho...