- Jul 5, 2017
- 886
- 3,118
The moment I learned that Sophia already claimed the "Treasure of Nadia" I suspected that there was a plothole on this that needed to be filled. The fact that she claims that she's Nadia herself fill some gaps, but not all of them.
I mean, if she's really Nadia, how she survived the curse for so much time, while the others had died? If she's now a half-demon, why she used the power of the church 400 years ago and passed basically undercovered all these years?
Unless she's using the "Vandall Savage" kind of disguises (keeps changing his birth dates with stillborn kids or kidnapping people to steal their identities), I don't think it makes sense.
It's a good game which explain some details from the present game, especially that part of the DNA alterations and the role of the church, but it's not obligatory.
I mean, if she's really Nadia, how she survived the curse for so much time, while the others had died? If she's now a half-demon, why she used the power of the church 400 years ago and passed basically undercovered all these years?
Unless she's using the "Vandall Savage" kind of disguises (keeps changing his birth dates with stillborn kids or kidnapping people to steal their identities), I don't think it makes sense.
I've tried to play Lust Epidemic some time ago, I don't think it holds well. MC's from that game (Brad, which appear with Bancroft on this game) is kinda asshole if compared with the actual MC. Characters aren't likeable like this one, and I think the game has a problem of being primitive if compared with Treasure of Nadia.Is playing the first one necessary?
It's a good game which explain some details from the present game, especially that part of the DNA alterations and the role of the church, but it's not obligatory.