TheFuture667
New Member
- Feb 2, 2018
- 11
- 3
- 13
When I am at the pool, they all hint at sex after the events, but then when I go to the changing room there is no way to go into the green stalls? Is this a bug?
nop. there is no scene there. yeah its a shameWhen I am at the pool, they all hint at sex after the events, but then when I go to the changing room there is no way to go into the green stalls? Is this a bug?
if you cant make it yet.Hey guys I'm kinda stuck on how to get the mom & sis threesome scene
The notes just say hit the hay but she won't do anything now. I recorded the scene of sis. But I don't know what to do next
Can anyone help me?
Thanks man but so how can I complete the "Getting her wet" task?nop. there is no scene there. yeah its a shame
srry i forget to answer. you have to do EXACTLY what is written in the notes otherwhise events wont triggerThanks man but so how can I complete the "Getting her wet" task?
-NOTE- I posted the following here as well (seemed appropriate considering your comment): Comment on Shota v LoliKinda messed up how shota is completely fine but as soon as someone suggest loli everybody goes crazy and picks up their torches and pitchforks. The double standard is real XD
Kinda messed up how shota is completely fine but as soon as someone suggest loli everybody goes crazy and picks up their torches and pitchforks. The double standard is real XD
Honestly, I think the distinction and double standard is fairly simple to explain.a bunch of words
Basically THIS. most of the loli consumers (not everyone) is potential pedophile bc the object of desire in this kind of games is obviously the little girl with 4.000 years old (little tits, little ass, childish aspect, inocent, etc) . shota games would be more a projection of desire to be in the child's situation. to wish to had a sexualized childhood like thatSo, if I'm not wrong, the "object" of a shota porn isn't the kid, it's the grown woman the kid is with, whereas the object of a loli porn is the kid.
First, thank you for the well thought out and comprehensive response.Honestly, I think the distinction and double standard is fairly simple to explain.
Now, let it be acknowledged that things are ultimately at a case by case basis: each individual person has their personal tastes for their own individual reasons. But any given thing has its "primary source". The usual cause of it, or some such.
Each case of a person being into loli may be different from the "standard" but if I'm not mistaken the general source of loli things is men who are into almost childlike women. Men trying to get close to but not reach pedophilia. At least not "officially" *It says right here she's 2000 years old thank you very much.* Some given individual might not fit that billet but as a generalization that's where loli comes from; borderline pedophilia.
The same "disclamer" about given individuals applies to shota. Some of the fans of it here and there are going to be adult men and woman wanting characters that look like little boys; borderline or not-so-borderling pedophilia. But that doesn't seem to be the "primary source" of shota, the usual cause. If I am not mistaken, the general source of shota is grown men entertaining their childhood fantasies. Not seeing the child as the object of the porn, but saying to themselves "I am that child, this is what my childhood was like." A video or whatever of a shota and their teacher may be watched by a woman into shota, but normally it's watched by a man who had a crush on his teacher when he was a kid trying to virtually live out that childhood fantasy.
So, if I'm not wrong, the "object" of a shota porn isn't the kid, it's the grown woman the kid is with, whereas the object of a loli porn is the kid. In which case it's not a question of boy vs girl, but a question of whether the "target" is the kid or adult.
Right, sorry, the "not really a kid because the disclaimer said so and the lore says its thousands of years old."
As for how important the distinction I offer is or isn't, I'm not inclined to propose a verdict.
1: Frankly I'm not familiar with the rules of what's allowed on here or on patreon. I'm not a creator so I don't really have to worry about it. Can't post something against the rules if I'm not posting anything.stuff
Great response, thank you!1: Frankly I'm not familiar with the rules of what's allowed on here or on patreon. I'm not a creator so I don't really have to worry about it. Can't post something against the rules if I'm not posting anything.
2:
The direction of the seduction and which character is the player character really aren't significant. Men fantasized about seducing, dominating, coercing, and whatnot women when they were kids and as adults they fantasize about having done it as a kid. Men also fantasized about being seduced, dominated, coerced, and whatnot by woman as a kid, and as adults fantasize about it having been done to them. Group all the causes of "yay sex happened" into simply "initiation", and we can simply say that it doesn't matter who initiated, the shota or the woman, because it's still the woman that's the target and the shota is still just the self insert for the man playing the game. Likewise, whether the fantasy is being iniator or initatee, both fantasies can be lived out in the game regardless of which character the player controls. A man with a fantasy about teachers initiating on him as a kid is still going to enjoy the game where the player character is the lady teacher. Naturally, all that can be reversed for the loli situation to say it's still about the loli. So the question about the distinction between the direction of initation and who the player controls might be worth asking, but the answer is that it doesn't matter, since it doesn't change anything. This might be a bit of an overstatement, but basically, no matter the direction the game or whatever goes, barring the occasional exception, loli is for pedos and shota is for regular healthy men that had fantasies as a kid.
As for the inclusion of other underage characters besides the shota himself in a shota porn, well, I guess people can use the defense "hey the character I'm playing as is a minor so it's not pedophilia, it's a minor with a minor" and as such live out the fantasies they had as a kid about step sisters, real sisters, classmates whoever else without feeling like it's bad. Because, in their mind at least, it's not adult them looking at a kid, it's 14 year old them looking at another 14 year old they knew back then. Is that a good defense? A valid one? I guess I don't really know, but it's clearly been accepted, not just here but in general, considering all the games, movies, shows, and whatnot targeted at adults but taking place in high school or whatever. I mean, Persona 5. A game where you play as a highschooler and seduce like 100 other kids, and though there's no actual porn they all get an implied sex scene sooner or later, but the game is widely succesful with nobody accusing it of catering to pedophilia or even being appropriate, since you *do* play as a kid yourself.
I understand why you would think that way. However, I personally disagree. (THIS IS AN OPINION) I believe that loli and shota are both equally fine. Considering that in most instances, it's fiction. I, myself, like loli and shota hentai. But I do NOT consider myself a paedo, since I despise and have a desire to castrate people who commit sexual acts with minors, whether with boys or girls. It would be hypocritical to consider shota fine if loli wouldn't be fine, since both kinks involve fictional minors. However, yet again, it is fiction, and a person liking the shota/loli kink does not necessarily mean that they would approve or enact IRL paedophilic acts. Hell, the ones that do deserve to fucking die publicly in my opinion. Look, my point is: Don't generalise. Just because someone might like scat, piss or even bestiality in hentai, doesn't mean they want to recieve/give fecal matter, urine or have sex with animals. Same counts for Lolicons and shotacons. It's a grey line, I know, but please try to stop generalising. Ageplay is okay in porn too, and you don't see the actors performing coïtus with minors.1: Frankly I'm not familiar with the rules of what's allowed on here or on patreon. I'm not a creator so I don't really have to worry about it. Can't post something against the rules if I'm not posting anything.
2:
The direction of the seduction and which character is the player character really aren't significant. Men fantasized about seducing, dominating, coercing, and whatnot women when they were kids and as adults they fantasize about having done it as a kid. Men also fantasized about being seduced, dominated, coerced, and whatnot by woman as a kid, and as adults fantasize about it having been done to them. Group all the causes of "yay sex happened" into simply "initiation", and we can simply say that it doesn't matter who initiated, the shota or the woman, because it's still the woman that's the target and the shota is still just the self insert for the man playing the game. Likewise, whether the fantasy is being iniator or initatee, both fantasies can be lived out in the game regardless of which character the player controls. A man with a fantasy about teachers initiating on him as a kid is still going to enjoy the game where the player character is the lady teacher. Naturally, all that can be reversed for the loli situation to say it's still about the loli. So the question about the distinction between the direction of initation and who the player controls might be worth asking, but the answer is that it doesn't matter, since it doesn't change anything. This might be a bit of an overstatement, but basically, no matter the direction the game or whatever goes, barring the occasional exception, loli is for pedos and shota is for regular healthy men that had fantasies as a kid.
As for the inclusion of other underage characters besides the shota himself in a shota porn, well, I guess people can use the defense "hey the character I'm playing as is a minor so it's not pedophilia, it's a minor with a minor" and as such live out the fantasies they had as a kid about step sisters, real sisters, classmates whoever else without feeling like it's bad. Because, in their mind at least, it's not adult them looking at a kid, it's 14 year old them looking at another 14 year old they knew back then. Is that a good defense? A valid one? I guess I don't really know, but it's clearly been accepted, not just here but in general, considering all the games, movies, shows, and whatnot targeted at adults but taking place in high school or whatever. I mean, Persona 5. A game where you play as a highschooler and seduce like 100 other kids, and though there's no actual porn they all get an implied sex scene sooner or later, but the game is widely succesful with nobody accusing it of catering to pedophilia or even being appropriate, since you *do* play as a kid yourself.
This has been bugging the shit out of me and couldn't find anything that could help on here. 1st thing - go to your powers ('w' key) and turn the X-ray ones on and then - turn off invisibility. Then try to touch the girls with the hearts above them when the guy is near. Eventually, after 5 or 6 times you kill him.I'm stuck with dominus fight. Can anyone tell how to clear it?
For Fred you can speak to him in School at lunch time. If you look at the top row of kids there is the guy you sell photos to on the far left. To the right of this guy are two kids together. Pretty sure Fred is the left guy.I’m stuck in a couple areas and would like some guidance please.
Firstly, where can I find Fred? I’m trying to advance the mom route but can’t until I speak with him.
Second, when you play hide and seek with Kimberly where is Kimberly hiding? I csnt seem to find her at all.
Thanks!