Wildlife is not a game after 6 years and it probably won't be in the next 6 years. You say that it's better situation when Devs release updates instead of running away with money. In my opinion - yes it is better, but for them, not for the supporters.
Why? Because if you grab some money and run away with them - that's a clear situation. Everybody knows that they get cheated on, everybody knows that was just a big fraud. And that's it. There is no financial support anymore. No more victims of such a practice.
But if someone is "smart" or "clever" enough, and see "the big picture" then dragging out development instead of running away with money it's much more profitable. If you are doing it right, then nobody can call it a fraud, but still you receive a shitload of money barely doing anything. You're just acting accordingly and getting payed for that.
As I said before - quantity of updates means nothing, quality means everything. And I always look at the final product - that alone will tell you more, than 1000 of updates or "devs being transparent with this or that".
I've played this game when the first playable version was released. Let's say I checked on this game one time per year.
When I posted my actual opinion about the game being "horrible" it was just because of this last April version.
After all those years this game it's not even standing in place - it's gradually worse, update after an update.
There is one thing that I actually agree with you on though. "It's not that deep". That's a correct statement. It's pretty clear what is happening here. But some of the "dudes" refuse to see that. Maybe it's just a denial. Nobody likes to admit their mistakes.
In the end, I don't care about this game at all. I'm just losing my time to write this shit just because I was called to the chalkboard because of my previous (totally deserved) opinion.
