- Feb 15, 2019
- 112
- 80
Perhaps a dumb question, but is there a way to play as a black guy in v1? Or is there a way to play v2 without having had played v1/what are the differences?
Basically the IANVS is handing the game over to meepish. IANVs is staying on as writer but Meepish is in full control. There will be a reboot of the game with updated models and a slight change to the story. No game updates as of yet and probably wont be for a while. So check back in a bit.I tried to read back to see whats happening. Is this one a go again or still abandoned
TYBasically the IANVS is handing the game over to meepish. IANVs is staying on as writer but Meepish is in full control. There will be a reboot of the game with updated models and a slight change to the story. No game updates as of yet and probably wont be for a while. So check back in a bit.
No need to get angry as you work.i am working furiously on it
good to know!Hell yeah, keep it up meepish.
Also, since G9 currently has a very small pool of skins i suggest you take a look at MB Skin Transfer Helper, you can convert any skin from G8.1 to G9 and still use the awesome G9 normals/etc.
Sadly, I do think this could be problematic. So the players are controlling both the protagonist and the LIs? What happens when Roger wants to do something but Amanda chooses against it? Are you going to have a tug-of-war coded or something? Maybe if you elaborate on what you're thinking it might make more sense.i want to have dialogue choices for the girls when ever roger isnt in a scene. romie says it steals from the immersion.
what do you think?
ps. im still gonna make my own decision, just wondering if anyone agrees with romie.
pss. i hate it when hes right about stuff!
psss. dont agree with him because his ego sucks and im right and manipulating these girls from inside their horny little minds is the best!
pssss. i dont know what the limit on psssses is.
ppssss. I ALWAYS WIN ROMIE!!
i am thinking simpler. if roger is in the scene you control roger. if roger is not in the scene you control the girl.Sadly, I do think this could be problematic. So the players are controlling both the protagonist and the LIs? What happens when Roger wants to do something but Amanda chooses against it? Are you going to have a tug-of-war coded or something? Maybe if you elaborate on what you're thinking it might make more sense.
There are games here that this works well for. Babysitters by Tabbo and Our Red Strings by Eva Kiss, for example. There are people on this site that are adamant about not having multi-protag games. I don't mind as much so long as there is a primary protagonist. I don't mind controlling the debauchery of other characters.i am thinking simpler. if roger is in the scene you control roger. if roger is not in the scene you control the girl.
im still waffling over it.
I could see that working if it's something like what kind of stuff she wants to do with Roger later — how she wants to dress, whether she'll have courage to say something specific to him, or whatever. But I don't think having huge variance because of a possible conflict of feelings / interest is a good idea generally. One, it's likely a nightmare to code; two, it's probably frustrating for many players; three, it's less immersive, because who is the player supposed to identify with? The protagonist is generally the person someone is "playing"; if you have others, feelings from players are likely to get all messed up and confused. But, as GetOutOfMyLab says, it can work. You just need to go about it the right way.i am thinking simpler. if roger is in the scene you control roger. if roger is not in the scene you control the girl.
im still waffling over it.
I personally don't have an issue with this, but that would get the game on this forum labeled with multiple protag and female protag and might put people off that aren't into that. I guess in some ways that's appropriate, but just playing devil's advocate on it.i am thinking simpler. if roger is in the scene you control roger. if roger is not in the scene you control the girl.
im still waffling over it.
Tbh I also find it makes a game less immersive, and it's not something I'm personally all that into. As CookieMonster666 said the player is less able to identify with the main protag. That said, this is a visual novel, and there are some very well written novels that benefit greatly from the dramatic irony that comes from seeing multiple characters' perspectives.i want to have dialogue choices for the girls when ever roger isnt in a scene. romie says it steals from the immersion.
what do you think?
It's not even just about the immersion. It's the added complexity in coding and writing that should probably be the biggest concern.i want to have dialogue choices for the girls when ever roger isnt in a scene. romie says it steals from the immersion.
what do you think?
ps. im still gonna make my own decision, just wondering if anyone agrees with romie.
pss. i hate it when hes right about stuff!
psss. dont agree with him because his ego sucks and im right and manipulating these girls from inside their horny little minds is the best!
pssss. i dont know what the limit on psssses is.
ppssss. I ALWAYS WIN ROMIE!!
Considering the whole premise of the game is MC retelling his degenerate adventures to his therapist, I have to agree with this Romie fella.i want to have dialogue choices for the girls when ever roger isnt in a scene. romie says it steals from the immersion.
what do you think?
ps. im still gonna make my own decision, just wondering if anyone agrees with romie.
pss. i hate it when hes right about stuff!
psss. dont agree with him because his ego sucks and im right and manipulating these girls from inside their horny little minds is the best!
pssss. i dont know what the limit on psssses is.
ppssss. I ALWAYS WIN ROMIE!!
So the story that plays out is a visualization of what MC is telling his therapist. He could have found out things that happened while he was not present and now he is telling his therapist. So IMO:i want to have dialogue choices for the girls when ever roger isnt in a scene. romie says it steals from the immersion.
what do you think?
ps. im still gonna make my own decision, just wondering if anyone agrees with romie.
pss. i hate it when hes right about stuff!
psss. dont agree with him because his ego sucks and im right and manipulating these girls from inside their horny little minds is the best!
pssss. i dont know what the limit on psssses is.
ppssss. I ALWAYS WIN ROMIE!!
Absolutely steals from the immersion, as well as the general flow, balance and professional shine on the game. Unless this VN were one with two or three switching MCs or an innovative VN experiment with a Game of Thrones style where there were no true main character, it would come out awkward. Unless you're a writer with Charlie-Kaufman-like talent, I wouldn't risk the latter either. Most VN's I've seen attempt this convenient perspective switch generally use it as a crutch and it never flows well. There are rules in story structure for how first, second and third-person perspective are generally used for a reason, too. Doubly so for VNs, which by necessity are easier to pull-off successfully in a first-person single-character perspective throughout. It takes a great writer to seamlessly break those rules of thumb.i want to have dialogue choices for the girls when ever roger isnt in a scene. romie says it steals from the immersion.
what do you think?
ps. im still gonna make my own decision, just wondering if anyone agrees with romie.
pss. i hate it when hes right about stuff!
psss. dont agree with him because his ego sucks and im right and manipulating these girls from inside their horny little minds is the best!
pssss. i dont know what the limit on psssses is.
ppssss. I ALWAYS WIN ROMIE!!