- Aug 7, 2017
- 527
- 981
Not going to dig through 1068 pages to get an answer, so I'll just ask: why is there a reference to the two Russian generals disgraced at the Battle of Tannenberg? Is it a British thing? Because if it isn't, that's a helluva deep cut.
[Not that I don't appreciate it, mind you. It is military history, coming from a military officer.]
[Not that I don't appreciate it, mind you. It is military history, coming from a military officer.]