- Dec 10, 2017
- 288
- 740
You're really trying to influence me here, aren't you, Notty?
You're really trying to influence me here, aren't you, Notty?
We can count our lucky stars that Notty can take some teasing.![]()
Sorry, too tempting![]()
Damn, now my suspicions are even higher!
Thank youMan, these continue to look great. Seems like every time I return to the thread I've got something to look forward to, and eight or more pages of praise to echo. Nothing I can say hasn't been said before, but this is just looking better and better, and I get even more excited for the re-releases.
I'm still unsure of my feelings on Kelly, but my goodness, if she doesn't look amazing here. Same absolutely goes for Chris.
*looks innocent*You're really trying to influence me here, aren't you, Notty?
Looking good, looking very good. True, it might not be impossible that fighting dirty might cost you points with Chris and score points with Kelly. Just as long as you win.
Oh that was just a quick render for gigglesLooking good, looking very good. True, it might not be impossible that fighting dirty might cost you points with Chris and score points with Kelly. Jut as long as you win.![]()
Have you started with the denoiser? You don't need near as many iterations with it running, a couple hundred is usually enough, depending on what you are doing...Thank you
I just wish I could go faster, but....it's really not looking bad tho!![]()
Although it's a bit sad that my "quick renders for larks" are better than my earlier "render all night" ones...Oh that was just a quick render for gigglesYou should see her at full iteration...
I lose too much skin detail. Makes the girls look "Barbie" again - which after all that time and effort on getting the skin right....nah. I'll have to passHave you started with the denoiser? You don't need near as many iterations with it running, a couple hundred is usually enough, depending on what you are doing...
Nah. Less sad, and more of a testament to how much better you're continually getting.Although it's a bit sad that my "quick renders for larks" are better than my earlier "render all night" ones...
I know what you mean, we have come a long way in a short time.Although it's a bit sad that my "quick renders for larks" are better than my earlier "render all night" ones...
Yup, let's "talk", dear roommate
While this may be true, I surmise you've been influenced by other people's work. At least to the extent of "I can do better", which leads to learning new things anywayUm...*makes it up as she goes along...*
I'm not sure about this denoiser thing. While it does take less time to render using it (from what I4ve heard), it also does make pictures look cartoonishly plastic. It's a style that has its fans, but I suspect this is not what Heavy Five is gearing towardsHave you started with the denoiser? You don't need near as many iterations with it running, a couple hundred is usually enough, depending on what you are doing...
Well then she might stop traffic in her tracks, give people heart- and hardattacks and leave a trail of broken hearts in her wake when just passing by.Oh that was just a quick render for gigglesYou should see her at full iteration...
She would see the stroker as a pet to train and if necessary neuterOne of those trueisms, within game though the question is if that would earn you Chris's respect or cost it.Remember keep your eyes on the end prize, even if you have to take an early lumping for that.
![]()
MC: I'm sorry Kels. I should have told you that I was adopted. I was afraid of what would've happen if we tried dating and it didn't work out
Well I guess, being able to render them at one go, without overlays and other tricks you needed in the past, might have something to do with that and also makes it easier to get lighting and composition right.Although it's a bit sad that my "quick renders for larks" are better than my earlier "render all night" ones...
*nods nods nods*While this may be true, I surmise you've been influenced by other people's work. At least to the extent of "I can do better", which leads to learning new things anyway![]()
No Barbies *sage nods*I'm not sure about this denoiser thing. While it does take less time to render using it (from what I4ve heard), it also does make pictures look cartoonishly plastic. It's a style that has its fans, but I suspect this is not what Heavy Five is gearing towards![]()
*curtsies*Though each of your ladies are between stunningly attractive and extremely good looking, for some reason
I can't help it if your family has attractive genes!Kelly has just a bit of extra. Typical that you made her into your lil sis meaniePoor Akamari.
Sometimes, it can have that effect a bit, depends on the settings and the resolution. Depending on the time saved, it's hard to say what it's worth. I haven't noticed a lot of loss, but I haven't done any full scenes either.I lose too much skin detail. Makes the girls look "Barbie" again - which after all that time and effort on getting the skin right....nah. I'll have to pass![]()
Honestly, I don't see it, sometimes I am still getting way more detail than I want...I'm not sure about this denoiser thing. While it does take less time to render using it (from what I4ve heard), it also does make pictures look cartoonishly plastic. It's a style that has its fans, but I suspect this is not what Heavy Five is gearing towards![]()
Could be. There is quite a difference between the first two chapters and Three in terms of composition. I don't know if you made changes to composition when you were redoing the early renders of Three though.I genuinely think that might have had something to do with the composition side of things tbh.
I can't help it if your family has attractive genes!