- Jun 3, 2017
- 5,132
- 27,295
- 765
- Thread starter Nottravis
- Start date
- Jun 3, 2017
- 5,132
- 27,295
- 765
Yeppers, or at least it is in my universe
One of the reasons I've been struggling with the assault vehicle is none of them made -any- fucking sense. There was something wrong with every single one of them. This one....yeah, I can live with it.Who knows?!
- Jun 3, 2017
- 5,132
- 27,295
- 765
Oh don't put intrigue in your game. The punters hate it *sage nods*
But as to the asset go for it. Vanny is a mix of about five or six I think. The seats are from one ship (Vannie's looked awful)*, most of the none "wall mounted" fittings are from all over the place. Certainly worth giving it a go at any rate.
*Dev note. The Vanguard seats are one of the few original assets from when I first started. Those, Chris and Sarah and the uniform design. Everything else got junked along the way.
Dripping
Well-Known Member
- Feb 16, 2019
- 1,354
- 3,360
- 351
You mean, like the one where the exhaust of the landing rockets would heat up the ground to a few thousand degrees right below the marines' exit ramp?Yeppers, or at least it is in my universe
- Jun 3, 2017
- 5,132
- 27,295
- 765
Probs. The worse one I saw was one with weapon ports and....urgh. I mean, weapon ports. Really? Is this space 1850?
- May 28, 2017
- 4,371
- 13,342
- 726
Yikes. I thought Amanda was perfect.
- Jun 3, 2017
- 5,132
- 27,295
- 765
*so wishes she'd had the sodding brains to use August Robot for her dev title/patreon page....*
Dripping
Well-Known Member
- Feb 16, 2019
- 1,354
- 3,360
- 351
Unless the marines' compartment was more or less a deployable container unit, weapon ports indeed make no sense. As a deployable container (I think it was Earth & Beyond that featured those), they totally make sense, provided they can be shut airtight for 0-pressure conditions, allowing for the container to be used as a light bunker.
- Jun 3, 2017
- 5,132
- 27,295
- 765
Good can always be improved.Yikes. I thought Amanda was perfect.
Aged stretched marks for a start.
- May 28, 2017
- 4,371
- 13,342
- 726
- May 28, 2017
- 4,371
- 13,342
- 726
- Jun 3, 2017
- 5,132
- 27,295
- 765
I'm more of the "visible targets are targets" school.
So I just see them as a death trap tbh. Unless its all small arms vs small arms natch
- May 28, 2017
- 4,371
- 13,342
- 726
- Jun 3, 2017
- 5,132
- 27,295
- 765
*eyes...*What would we call you then? Botty?
"Booty" would then come naturally. Ô August Booty!That can't be changed on Patreon?
What would we call you then? Botty?
Dripping
Well-Known Member
- Feb 16, 2019
- 1,354
- 3,360
- 351
Definitely, from the moment you deploy your troops. That's why those gunports would make sense on deployable containers: to lay down some suppressive fire while the first troops exit the container. Then the first ones to leave take position to lay down even more suppressive fire, allowing the last ones to get out as well. Everybody *has* to get out, since a container would be an easy target for a bigger weapon, and if the plan is to pick them up again in that same container, they'd want to draw fire away from it, which can only be accomplish by moving away from that thing. (no guarantee that the enemy won't shoot the thing to pieces anyway, though.)
- May 28, 2017
- 4,371
- 13,342
- 726
You might get a boot instead of eyes for that!
That's the bootyliciousness of it all!You might get a boot instead of eyes for that!
- Jun 3, 2017
- 5,132
- 27,295
- 765
But TheDevian 's fountain...
- Jun 3, 2017
- 5,132
- 27,295
- 765
Really?Yikes. I thought Amanda was perfect.
Of course now I need to find better hair....