Then
search the thread briefly to jog your memory instead of immediately jumping to "haven't seen it"
Let's rather say I didn't
remember it under the term:
Moreover, given:
if one of you guys who downloaded it back then could share it again
I thought the post had been deleted since, so there was no point searching for it.
--------------------------------------------
while claiming to have read everything?
Why even put it in doubt? I read posts, answer most, forget some.
I'm a human being with a personal life and JONT isn't my only hobby nor it is my main one. I'm not a paid community manager, I don't deserve shit for not seeing a message.
--------------------------------------------
I offer completely free work
We offer completely free work too.
--------------------------------------------
I politely
remind you once that I'd like an answer to whether you can use it
You
quoted ImperatorAugustus, not me. So I lost thread of it and thought he'd handle it.
Not the best group organization I concede, but if you want to attract our attention in case we missed something, it is better to "@" us or send us a private message than a simple quote which can get lost too low in the notification box.
--------------------------------------------
put in a slightly sarcastic reminder when others express an interest... I don't think
I am the one totally lacking in respect here.
"
Reading is hard?
" is a bit more than slightly sarcastic.
Your message got lost in the 24 pages of conversation that appeared in only a month. Nevertheless we're trying our best already to answer to everyone and make the game go forward (not mentioning the number of private messages we deal with daily).
You could have reminded us again politely rather than throwing a childish passive-agressive tantrum because your message didn't get noticed. Not only that but you're keeping the same douchebag self-entitled tone through your next message instead of calming down since you had my attention.
So my answer is basically: fuck off.
I'm not gatekeeping your work, feel free to do whatever and someone will eventually add your content to the wiki. Not me.
--------------------------------------------
I'm not claiming there aren't [any obstacles]. I'm saying 'I searched Gelbooru and didn't find everything' isn't necessarily the end of the it. There are other sources, some of which I exhibited in the links.
Nice attention but yes, of course, Gelbooru is not the only place I looked. It's obvious because it has no scat content and... the game has. So basically I had to check all internet for uncensored hentai. I have cited only Gelbooru because it was the most comfortable source to work with.
So no matter what, you'll still need to recolor hair for spider_sex (or others) on some hair-lengths, hair-colors and age categories, and that's with allowing small 600x800 pictures in the search.
Further limiting that image pool because we want big pictures, that'll be making the task impossible unless using a rescaling software...
I'm precising that further down this post.
--------------------------------------------
*shrug* Your current picture is also Takuya.
Which is a proof that these obstacles exist. I said:
I try to avoid too obvious rule 34 pictures from top 4 selling shonens. Unless they are literally the last resort.
--------------------------------------------
from a poorer angle and much less 'pink' than:
You must be registered to see the links
Much less "pink"?
If you're claiming the picture in your link is better than the one currently because of the pose and the hair pinkness... That's bold. I disagree.
Here are the current pictures in the game:
. Better art.
--------------------------------------------
Hiding other characters is harder, but it's also probably the best-drawn 'pink-haired fluting milf' picture out there.
Well it's not a flute, it's a clarinet
That's fine though; the slaver has a clarinet in his storage. What's not fine is that the cropping still shows hair reflection in the piano:
So yet another obstacle to make image adding easy.
--------------------------------------------
The frame isn't too hard, since you can copy and mirror the upper left corner.
Far from being sufficient.
--------------------------------------------
Basically, my point is that you could try and improve a large subset of your pictures to a higher resolution.
My next short-term plan is more:
. The endgoal is to replace all of those that look dated.
However, If we do take the decision to put a larger frame for scenes, we'll do it globally, not just for a large amount.
As I precised in my last post, "flute short-haired pink-haired milf" was a random non-defining exemple. There are some entries that are simply not findable; a minimum height would only reduce the already (surprisely) thin image pool I had at my disposal in 2019.
It'll also mean rescaling all existing pictures. This is something we can try to do by do a batch IA upscale (on Topaz Gigapixel for exemple). We'll see if the new UI project ever reach completion, it's true that it might be worth insisting on it.
--------------------------------------------
BTW, why are all the pictures in PNG format? Most of them aren't even transparent, so that's a serious waste of space and bandwidth as far as I can tell. Some issue with QSP?
Because I edit all the picture before putting them in the game, to get rid of watermarks or simply make them fit the resolution. Saving it to .jpg risks adding artifacts, so .png is better. The same way .flac or .wav is better than .mp3 and worth the additional space. At least for the sake of placebo.
It was also sending a message to future people working on the game, to care about the quality (originally it was in .gif... so as changing the format needed work, we figured we might as well hit a better target than simply .jpg).
And then I also did a
lossless compression.