Unreal Engine Completed Subverse [v1.1.1] [Studio Fow]

[UZone]

Oh man, this project is the gift that keeps on giving, just not in the way you expect it to. Haven't posted here in a long time, but after seeing how retarded this latest dev log was I just couldn't resist.

So basically, all those devotion scenes FOW have been hyping up for the past several years. the ones they said would blow all the stuff in Pandora out of the water, the ones they said would be similar in quality to their previous movies, the ones they asked their backers to wait for before judging the adult content, etc, etc...will now be inaccessible to those very same backers

Let's look at some of the highest rated feedback in the comments on Steam, shall we?
















Sorry for the screenshot spam, but this stuff is just too funny to miss. What happened to FOW, man? They used to be at the top of the adult animation industry, and look at them now. At this point, I think I'll do exactly what the devs don't want me to do and just wait for the complete scenes to be uploaded online once v1.0 is released...supposedly next year lol. As those people on Steam have mentioned, there is absolutely no point in playing Subverse from now until the release, so might as well just sit back and watch how this unfolds in the next year.

 

[KittyMaid]

This is NOT a porn game, remember? Why are you comparing it to porn games? You should be telling us that you find it more fulfilling than X-COM or Fire Emblem!

It feels like the devs really wanted to make a game wherein their audience wouldn't be biased towards a genre (e.g. Porn) and create a Witcher "has sex but no one really cares" vibe; But their mistake is that they advertised it as such.

What kind is misformation is that? It's literally advertised as a sci-fi parody sex game. Where did you get Witcher from? Sex and comedy are its prime targets. I don't recall Witcher doing the same. Not only do they both focus on different things but their story themes are not even close, nor is the gameplay either. You wouldn't have to say stuff like "It feels like the devs really wanted" if you just read what they post, they tell you exactly what they want. Why are you "feeling" instead of reading?

 

[Deleted member 6429235]

Here I will do the legwork for you of giving context you lack. deiter69 is making a joke about older posts that VValen has been posting in this thread for a long time now. Here are several examples of VValen constantly saying Subverse is not a porn game, but a game with porn in it. [1][2]

As for Vanilla's comment, idk how someone's opinion on how they feel about something is misinformation. Is their subjective opinion a false statement of how they feel? Or do you just not like the opinion shared?

For me and most people, I even think for the majority, is Subverse a porn game! And I will compare it to other porn games and how enjoyable it is.

For me I would give it a 2/5 or a 3/10. I think it is a bad porn game.

 

[HardcoreCuddler]

Here I will do the legwork for you of giving context you lack. deiter69 is making a joke about older posts that VValen has been posting in this thread for a long time now. Here are several examples of VValen constantly saying Subverse is not a porn game, but a game with porn in it. [1][2][3][4]

As for Vanilla's comment, idk how someone's opinion on how they feel about something is misinformation. Is their subjective opinion a false statement of how they feel? Or do you just not like the opinion shared?

me and the boys just ignore kittymaid and you probably should too lol

 

[KittyMaid]

Here I will do the legwork for you of giving context you lack. deiter69 is making a joke about older posts that VValen has been posting in this thread for a long time now. Here are several examples of VValen constantly saying Subverse is not a porn game, but a game with porn in it. [1][2][3][4]

As for Vanilla's comment, idk how someone's opinion on how they feel about something is misinformation. Is their subjective opinion a false statement of how they feel? Or do you just not like the opinion shared?

It's a pointless opinion on something that is already answered. It's like saying "it feels like if this game doesn't have any sex in it" You see how pointless that "opinion" is when it's obvious that it clearly does have sex in it.

 

[KittyMaid]

me and the boys just ignore kittymaid and you probably should too lol

Are you stalking me now? lol

 

[Yojimbo543]

Are you stalking me now? lol

Nobody's stalking you, you've just made a reputation for yourself here too. Time to reap what you've been sowing

 

[bourbon01]

how can i update from 07 -> 08 ?

 

[Deleted member 324588]

how can i update from 07 -> 08 ?

Download it all again, tis the life of a pirate.

 

[KittyMaid]

Nobody's stalking you, you've just made a reputation for yourself here too. Time to reap what you've been sowing

You flatter me UwU

 

[jscott313]

snipping to shorten

Wow that dev log...ouch. Where do you start...basically there's no point to even playing the EA versions anymore since the saves will get wiped before the final version and you'll just have to play the game again from scratch.
Not posting the final cinematic for the devotion quests seals that and adds further credence to the above since you have to replay it anyway...kinda silly considering the entire game gets leaked at places like this within a week of launch generally. I don't see eye to eye with the devs on that; seems like they are needlessly inconveniencing the legit customers.

I'm so glad I never bought this game.

 

[Redboi8]

Oh man, this project is the gift that keep on giving, just not in the way you expect it to. Haven't posted here in a long time, but after seeing how retarded this latest dev log was I just couldn't resist.

So basically, all those devotion scenes FOW have been hyping up for the past several years. the ones they said would blow all the stuff in Pandora out of the water, the ones they said would be similar in quality to their previous movies, the ones they asked their backers to wait for before judging the adult content, etc, etc...will now be inaccessible to those very same backers

Let's look at some of the highest rated feedback in the comments on Steam, shall we?

View attachment 2899542

View attachment 2899545
View attachment 2899547

View attachment 2899548

View attachment 2899549

View attachment 2899551

View attachment 2899552



Sorry for the screenshot spam, but this stuff is just too funny to miss. What happened to FOW, man? They used to be at the top of the adult animation industry, and look at them now. At this point, I think I'll do exactly what the devs don't want me to do and just wait for the complete scenes to be uploaded online once v1.0 is released...supposedly next year lol. As those people on Steam have mentioned, there is absolutely no point in playing Subverse from now until the release, so might as well just sit back and watch how this unfolds in the next year.

Yeah, everytime I think it can't be any worse, SFOW proves that I underestimate their ability to fuck things up...

 

[VanillaLover]

It's like saying "it feels like if this game doesn't have any sex in it" You see how pointless that "opinion" is when it's obvious that it clearly does have sex in it.

But my comment wasn't about that.
I was talking about how FOW treats Subverse as "a game with porn" than "a porn game" and how most people treat it like the latter. They wanted to take it in the former direction, but most people just bought it for the porn, not for the gameplay.

As for the misinformation, I did talk about any false points. FOW said they wanted to make an "actual game".

 

[KittyMaid]

But my comment wasn't about that.
I was talking about how FOW treats Subverse as "a game with porn" than "a porn game" and how most people treat it like the latter. They wanted to take it in the former direction, but most people just bought it for the porn, not for the gameplay.

As for the misinformation, I did talk about any false points. FOW said they wanted to make an "actual game".

yes a game that revolves around porn. Many games don't do either right, so they wanted to break that sigma by delivering a playable game without hurting the porn quality and blending it with comedy. Still don't see how Witcher ties in. It's the gameplay, theme, story, art, are all different. The only thing they share is the genre of being an RPG.

 

[Deleted member 6429235]

Can it be that FOW censores negative reviews on the discord?
I never never seen a negative review on the discord, that talks about the problem you can find on this site on the reviews.

 

[Deleted member 6429235]

yes a game that revolves around porn. Many games don't do either right, so they wanted to break that sigma by delivering a playable game without hurting the porn quality and blending it with comedy. Still don't see how Witcher ties in. It's the gameplay, theme, story, art, are all different. The only thing they share is the genre of being an RPG.

If that was the goal of the developers, then they failed.
For me its a bad game and a bad porn game.

 

[KittyMaid]

If that was the goal of the developers, then they failed.
For me its a bad game and a bad porn game.

Good for u

 

[Deleted member 324588]

If that was the goal of the developers, then they failed.
For me its a bad game and a bad porn game.

Well that’s subjective, so that’s your opinion. But given the game isn’t finished yet and it’s holding at mostly positive on steam with thousands of reviews, I’d say yours is in the minority at this point.

 

[Deleted member 6429235]

Well that’s subjective, so that’s your opinion. But given the game isn’t finished yet and it’s holding at mostly positive on steam with thousands of reviews, I’d say yours is in the minority at this point.

54% positive on steamdb (10,252 positive and 8,718 negative) and on this site a 2.9/5.
With this kind of rating, nah it's not a good game. When so many people have given it a bad rating/review.

When you are wondering why it is different.
But to make it quick. Steam Store doesn't count reviews from people who activated keys, it only counts the review from people that bought it on steam.

You must be registered to see the links

 

[Deleted member 324588]

View attachment 2903442
54% positive on steamdb (10,252 positive and 8,718 negative) and on this site a 2.9/5.
With this kind of rating, nah it's not a good game. When so many people have given it a bad rating/review.

When you are wondering why it is different.
But to make it quick. Steam Store doesn't count reviews from people who activated keys, it only counts the review from people that bought it on steam.

You must be registered to see the links

I hope that's not counting the review bombing it got over the chinese translation kerfuffle.